W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > November 2016

Re: Publication request: 2 documents for CR publication on the 22nd of November

From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 13:54:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CABevsUGGixHe8gD_CCaDGnW4fmo-P348SzBy6znEP_QEwH9M7g@mail.gmail.com>
To: t-cole3 <t-cole3@illinois.edu>
Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>, W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org>
I don't think we should leave them in the context document. I took them
out, but the re-revision may have resulted in the wrong version getting put
into ns/

The most recent version is:

    https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/blob/gh-pages/jsonld/anno.jsonld

which doesn't have them.

R

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Timothy Cole <t-cole3@illinois.edu> wrote:

> Since the model features moved to informative appendix of the model were
> optional (i.e., may or should rather than must), I do not believe we need
> to rearrange any of the Annotation model tests.
>
>
>
> HOWEVER, the json keys Composite, Independents, and List are no longer in
> our ontologies, although they are still present in our JSON-LD context
> document, and do appear in informative 'Proposed Definitions' appendix in
> the Vocab Rec.  So do we want to remove the handful of tests that do
> reference these keys? Thoughts? Personally, if we're going to leave these
> keys in our context document, I'd suggest leaving the tests in place as a
> convenience for developers going forward.  If we decide to remove these
> three keys from our context document then we probably should remove the
> tests.
>
>
>
> We definitely will need to update the test to Exit criteria mapping and
> the references to CR.
>
>
>
> -Tim Cole
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 22, 2016 9:20 AM
> *To:* Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>
> *Cc:* W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org>
>
> *Subject:* Re: Publication request: 2 documents for CR publication on the
> 22nd of November
>
>
>
> From my point of view:
>
>
>
> - some tests may have to pushed down to the optional spaces
>
> - the corresponding mapping table should be changed
>
> - the references to the CR should be updated:-)
>
>
>
> Ivan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 22 Nov 2016, at 15:29, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io> wrote:
>
>
>
> Do we need to make any changes to the test suites?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 3:38 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>
> FYI
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>
>
> *From: *Denis Ah-Kang <denis@w3.org>
>
> *Subject: Re: Publication request: 2 documents for CR publication on the
> 22nd of November*
>
> *Date: *22 November 2016 at 10:34:31 GMT+1
>
> *To: *Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, webreq <webreq@w3.org>
>
> *Cc: *W3C Communication Team <w3t-comm@w3.org>, Xueyuan Jia (贾雪远) <
> xueyuan@w3.org>, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>, Tim Cole <
> t-cole3@illinois.edu>, Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org>
>
> *X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: *No, score=-9.8
>
> *Message-Id: *<24995815-01a7-e3c9-dd04-b5b20fb6b53b@w3.org>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The documents have been published on http://www.w3.org/TR/.
>
> Regards,
>
> Denis
>
>
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Digital Publishing Technical Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
>
> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Shane McCarron
>
> Projects Manager, Spec-Ops
>
>
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Digital Publishing Technical Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
>
> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>
>
>
>



-- 
Rob Sanderson
Semantic Architect
The Getty Trust
Los Angeles, CA 90049
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2016 20:54:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:50 UTC