Re: Publication request: 2 documents for CR publication on the 22nd of November

My preference would be to take them out completely. We don't need to test
for non normative things ... such as extensions, or new Motivations via
skos patterns, etc.

I don't mind if we leave them in the optional part, but it makes it harder
to separate out the "only one implementation" of a particular feature when
we come to defend the transition.

R



On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

>
> On 22 Nov 2016, at 17:12, Timothy Cole <t-cole3@illinois.edu> wrote:
>
> Since the model features moved to informative appendix of the model were
> optional (i.e., may or should rather than must), I do not believe we need
> to rearrange any of the Annotation model tests.
>
> HOWEVER, the json keys Composite, Independents, and List are no longer in
> our ontologies, although they are still present in our JSON-LD context
> document, and do appear in informative 'Proposed Definitions' appendix in
> the Vocab Rec.  So do we want to remove the handful of tests that do
> reference these keys? Thoughts? Personally, if we're going to leave these
> keys in our context document, I'd suggest leaving the tests in place as a
> convenience for developers going forward.  If we decide to remove these
> three keys from our context document then we probably should remove the
> tests.
>
>
> My feeling is that these tests should stay as part of the optional section
>
> Ivan
>
>
>
> We definitely will need to update the test to Exit criteria mapping and
> the references to CR.
>
> -Tim Cole
>
>
> *From:* Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org <ivan@w3.org>]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 22, 2016 9:20 AM
> *To:* Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>
> *Cc:* W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Re: Publication request: 2 documents for CR publication on the
> 22nd of November
>
> From my point of view:
>
> - some tests may have to pushed down to the optional spaces
> - the corresponding mapping table should be changed
> - the references to the CR should be updated:-)
>
> Ivan
>
>
>
>
> On 22 Nov 2016, at 15:29, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io> wrote:
>
> Do we need to make any changes to the test suites?
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 3:38 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>
> FYI
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From: *Denis Ah-Kang <denis@w3.org>
> *Subject: Re: Publication request: 2 documents for CR publication on the
> 22nd of November*
> *Date: *22 November 2016 at 10:34:31 GMT+1
> *To: *Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, webreq <webreq@w3.org>
> *Cc: *W3C Communication Team <w3t-comm@w3.org>, Xueyuan Jia (贾雪远) <
> xueyuan@w3.org>, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>, Tim Cole <
> t-cole3@illinois.edu>, Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org>
> *X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: *No, score=-9.8
> *Message-Id: *<24995815-01a7-e3c9-dd04-b5b20fb6b53b@w3.org>
>
> Hi,
>
> The documents have been published on http://www.w3.org/TR/.
>
> Regards,
>
> Denis
>
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Digital Publishing Technical Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
>
> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Shane McCarron
> Projects Manager, Spec-Ops
>
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Digital Publishing Technical Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
>
> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Digital Publishing Technical Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Rob Sanderson
Semantic Architect
The Getty Trust
Los Angeles, CA 90049