Re: Publication request: 2 documents for CR publication on the 22nd of November

If intent is to remove Composite, List, Independents from context, then definitely should remove tests associated with these keys.

Suggest leaving tests that detect Choice as Target and use of creator with Target since these keys (which are being used with Body) remain in context.

Tim Cole


Univ of Illinois at UC

Sent from my phone. Apologies for typos.

<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> </div><div>Date:11/22/2016  14:54  (GMT-06:00) </div><div>To: t-cole3 <t-cole3@illinois.edu> </div><div>Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>, W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org> </div><div>Subject: Re: Publication request: 2 documents for CR publication on the 22nd of November </div><div>
</div>
I don't think we should leave them in the context document. I took them out, but the re-revision may have resulted in the wrong version getting put into ns/

The most recent version is:

    https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/blob/gh-pages/jsonld/anno.jsonld

which doesn't have them.

R

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Timothy Cole <t-cole3@illinois.edu> wrote:
Since the model features moved to informative appendix of the model were optional (i.e., may or should rather than must), I do not believe we need to rearrange any of the Annotation model tests.

 

HOWEVER, the json keys Composite, Independents, and List are no longer in our ontologies, although they are still present in our JSON-LD context document, and do appear in informative 'Proposed Definitions' appendix in the Vocab Rec.  So do we want to remove the handful of tests that do reference these keys? Thoughts? Personally, if we're going to leave these keys in our context document, I'd suggest leaving the tests in place as a convenience for developers going forward.  If we decide to remove these three keys from our context document then we probably should remove the tests.

 

We definitely will need to update the test to Exit criteria mapping and the references to CR.

 

-Tim Cole

 

 

From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 9:20 AM
To: Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>
Cc: W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org>


Subject: Re: Publication request: 2 documents for CR publication on the 22nd of November
 

From my point of view:

 

- some tests may have to pushed down to the optional spaces

- the corresponding mapping table should be changed

- the references to the CR should be updated:-)

 

Ivan

 

 

 

On 22 Nov 2016, at 15:29, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io> wrote:

 

Do we need to make any changes to the test suites?

 

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 3:38 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

FYI




Begin forwarded message:

 

From: Denis Ah-Kang <denis@w3.org>

Subject: Re: Publication request: 2 documents for CR publication on the 22nd of November

Date: 22 November 2016 at 10:34:31 GMT+1

To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, webreq <webreq@w3.org>

Cc: W3C Communication Team <w3t-comm@w3.org>, Xueyuan Jia (贾雪远) <xueyuan@w3.org>, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>, Tim Cole <t-cole3@illinois.edu>, Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org>

X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8

Message-Id: <24995815-01a7-e3c9-dd04-b5b20fb6b53b@w3.org>

 

Hi,

The documents have been published on http://www.w3.org/TR/.

Regards,

Denis

 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C 
Digital Publishing Technical Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153

ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704



 




 

--

Shane McCarron

Projects Manager, Spec-Ops

 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C 
Digital Publishing Technical Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153

ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704



 




-- 
Rob Sanderson
Semantic Architect
The Getty Trust
Los Angeles, CA 90049