W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > November 2016

Re: URGENT: bodyValue

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 20:51:58 +0100
Cc: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>, Web Annotation <public-annotation@w3.org>
Message-Id: <170AE127-B04C-4D36-BBEF-BF847CA45395@w3.org>
To: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liam@w3.org>
Liam,

we do plan to publish a revised CR...

Ivan

----
Ivan Herman
+31 641044153

(Written on my mobile. Excuses for brevity and frequent misspellings...)



> On 11 Nov 2016, at 20:48, Liam R. E. Quin <liam@w3.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 2016-11-11 at 10:02 -0800, Robert Sanderson wrote:
>> One of our exit criteria is:
>> 
>>     The bodyValue property of an Annotation.
>> 
>> However according to the report (
>> http://td.spec-ops.io/test-results/annotation-model/all.html), we
>> have only
>> one implementation of bodyValue (EF).  It's 1:4 in the annotation
>> optionals
>> section.
>> 
>> I don't believe we'll get a second implementation of it, so do we:
>> 
>> * Just remove the exit criterion, as it's an optional feature anyway
> 
> That sounds like a substantive change, so you could publish a new LCCR.
> 
> But, if it's an optional feature, isn't one implementation enough?
> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 11 November 2016 19:52:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:50 UTC