Re: URGENT: bodyValue

Liam,

we do plan to publish a revised CR...

Ivan

----
Ivan Herman
+31 641044153

(Written on my mobile. Excuses for brevity and frequent misspellings...)



> On 11 Nov 2016, at 20:48, Liam R. E. Quin <liam@w3.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 2016-11-11 at 10:02 -0800, Robert Sanderson wrote:
>> One of our exit criteria is:
>> 
>>     The bodyValue property of an Annotation.
>> 
>> However according to the report (
>> http://td.spec-ops.io/test-results/annotation-model/all.html), we
>> have only
>> one implementation of bodyValue (EF).  It's 1:4 in the annotation
>> optionals
>> section.
>> 
>> I don't believe we'll get a second implementation of it, so do we:
>> 
>> * Just remove the exit criterion, as it's an optional feature anyway
> 
> That sounds like a substantive change, so you could publish a new LCCR.
> 
> But, if it's an optional feature, isn't one implementation enough?
> 
> 
> 

Received on Friday, 11 November 2016 19:52:12 UTC