W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > November 2016

Re: URGENT: bodyValue

From: Liam R. E. Quin <liam@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:48:03 -0500
Message-ID: <1478893683.27355.30.camel@w3.org>
To: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>, Web Annotation <public-annotation@w3.org>
On Fri, 2016-11-11 at 10:02 -0800, Robert Sanderson wrote:
> One of our exit criteria is:
> 
>     The bodyValue property of an Annotation.
> 
> However according to the report (
> http://td.spec-ops.io/test-results/annotation-model/all.html), we
> have only
> one implementation of bodyValue (EF).  It's 1:4 in the annotation
> optionals
> section.
> 
> I don't believe we'll get a second implementation of it, so do we:
> 
> * Just remove the exit criterion, as it's an optional feature anyway

That sounds like a substantive change, so you could publish a new LCCR.

But, if it's an optional feature, isn't one implementation enough?
Received on Friday, 11 November 2016 19:48:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:50 UTC