Re: Revising http://w3.org/annotation/

I think that is a good idea, I would also think of updating the Wikipedia
page with the link/references to the documents (they are just listed now):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_annotation

Best,
Paolo

On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Benjamin Young <byoung@bigbluehat.com>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Now that 2 out of our 3 documents have hit CR and our focus for the next
> few months is pretty cemented, I’d like to propose that we revisit the
> content at http://w3.org/annotation/
>
>
>
> I’d like to see it focused mostly on four things (and in this order if
> possible):
>
> - overview/intro
>
> - documents and their states
>
> - implementation encouragement
>
> - testing
>
>
>
> I’m happy to run point on this, if that would help.
>
>
>
> I’d like it to serve as a great landing page for folks interested in using
> and building on Web Annotation Data Model, Vocab, and Protocol (when that’s
> fully baked).
>
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Benjamin
>
> --
>
> http://bigbluehat.com/
>
> http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung
>
>
>



-- 
Dr. Paolo Ciccarese
Principal Knowledge and Software Engineer at PerkinElmer Innovation Lab
Assistant Professor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School

Assistant in Neuroscience at Mass General Hospital
ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5156-2703