W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > January 2016

Re: This is exclusively an FYI...

From: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 07:51:40 -0500
To: public-annotation@w3.org
Message-ID: <56AB605C.1050803@csarven.ca>
On 2016-01-29 07:28, Ivan Herman wrote:
> … a new version of the SHACL draft has just been published:
>
> Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL)
> https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160128/
>
> This /could/ be used to check an annotation whether it abides to certain
> constraints as for the properties it uses, the values those properties
> may have, etc. However, this is only a general FYI because:
>
> • It's a draft, we cannot count on it to be a Rec in the lifetime of the
> current group
> • It is unclear who the implementers will be. At the moment I presume
> TopQuandrant will have an implementation (maybe it already has), but I
> do not know of others

https://github.com/linkeddata/dokieli/issues/105

> • As it stands today, the draft is fairly opaque for non-RDF people (and
> even for those it is not necessarily an easy read), it also requires a
> good understanding of SPARQL, etc.
>
> Note, however, that it should be possible to create a 'Shape' for
> annotations once and for all, that could be used, in conjunction with a
> SHACL engine, as a black box validation checker for an Annotation.  I
> expect it to be fairly complex, though.
>
> Again, this is an FYI, I do not think this is something this WG should do...
>
> Ivan
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Digital Publishing Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>
>
>
>


-Sarven
http://csarven.ca/#i
Received on Friday, 29 January 2016 12:52:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:43 UTC