W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > January 2016

Re: [web-annotation] Multiple Selectors

From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 17:58:40 +0000
To: public-annotation@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-173993135-1453485519-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

> @iherman No worries regarding "spaghetti". I didn't think you were 
being dismissive but IIRC these discussions are public (and/or the 
archives are public, I forget which it is)
> so I wanted to clarify for the "audience." On the whole we should 
all probably watch out for pejorative terms (and I'm certainly as 
guilty of using them as anyone).
> Regarding "@type". For the examples I merely repeated Hugo's 
verbage. IMO, it's probably very safe to replace "@type" with "type" 
as Rob has done in the proposed example. (IIRC we have already had 
this debate elsewhere and I thought that it was settled that we were 
making the substitution, thus the use of "type" in the proposed 
solution.) Perhaps @hugomanguinhas could say if my understanding also 
matches his regarding "@type"/"type".
In fact, my issue was not whether we use type or @type (I am not sure 
any more which approach we have adopted); I questioned whether the 
type information is necessary at all. But I don't want to reopen this 
discussion. However, a fair comparison of the two extracts requires 
either to use them everywhere in both examples, or none of them in 

> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

GitHub Notification of comment by iherman
Please view or discuss this issue at 
 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 22 January 2016 17:58:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:43 UTC