- From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 11:14:37 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
> Given the resolution of this issue, I was wondering if there are strong reasons why the specification does not allow a literal to be annotated with the language (i.e. both dc:language and xml:lang refer to http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp47 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp47> as normative spec)? > This is the normal practice when representing data in RDF and the use of dc:language is normally used to state the language of the resource being described and not the language of the terms being used to describe it. > Not sure what you mean. Do you mean that we should have a selector which includes a language tag, too? Is there a use case for this? -- GitHub Notification of comment by iherman Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/134#issuecomment-181314687 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 8 February 2016 11:14:40 UTC