- From: Hugo Manguinhas via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 10:56:53 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
Hello all, Given the resolution of this issue, I was wondering if there are strong reasons why the specification does not allow a literal to be annotated with the language (i.e. both dc:language and xml:lang refer to http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp47 as normative spec)? This is the normal practice when representing data in RDF and the use of dc:language is normally used to state the language of the resource being described and not the language of the terms being used to describe it. BR, Hugo -- GitHub Notification of comment by hugomanguinhas Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/134#issuecomment-181306183 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 8 February 2016 10:56:56 UTC