Re: Basic Roles Proposal

Hi Takeshi,

> On 01 Sep 2015, at 10:34 , Kanai, Takeshi <Takeshi.Kanai@jp.sony.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Ivan and Rob,
> 
> “role” is not mandatory and we can still put dc:language into “content” nodes, these are my understandings.

Yes, that is my understanding, too. And, if we accept 3.2.3, then the content node can be replaced by a direct text, ie,

"body" : {
 "language" :"en",
 "text" : "My comment"
}

is also valid.

> Having “language” in body was “recommended” in the FPWD, but it is prohibited in the newly provided scheme 3.1.9, besides I found no language descriptions in the new document, then I got confused.

I am not sure what you mean by 'recommended' and 'prohibited'. In the FPWD[1], if you use a simple textual body, then there is no language associated to it either; it explicitly says

• The string body must be an xsd:string and must not have a language associated with it.

I do not think 3.1.9 in the roles' document introduces any change on that.

But I may misunderstand what you mean.

Thanks

Ivan


[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-annotation-model-20141211/#simple-textual-body


> Thank you for confirming it.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Takeshi Kanai
> 
> From: Robert Sanderson [mailto:azaroth42@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2015 12:06 AM
> To: Ivan Herman
> Cc: Kanai, Takeshi; W3C Public Annotation List
> Subject: Re: Basic Roles Proposal
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> Hi Takeshi,
> > Let me confirm. If a person/system would like to set language to the body text for some reasons, the person/system has to take 3.1.2 or 3.1.3 approach and add unknown role property. Correct?
> 
> Although I am not Rob, but…
> I believe it is not necessary to add an unknown property. Ie,
> 
>     "body": {
>       "content": {
>          "text": "I love this thing",
>          "language" : "en"
>       }
>     }
> 
> is also fine.
> 
> Yes, this is exactly correct :)
> 
> Or the exact same structure in Turtle:
> 
> _:anno a oa:Annotation ;
>   oa:hasBody [
>     oa:hasSource [
>       oa:text "I love this thing" ;
>       dc:language "en"
>     ]
>   ]
> ]
> 
> Though I expect that most annotations will at least be able to say that it's commenting versus tagging.
> 
> 
> Actually, if we accept 3.2.3, then we can also say
>     "body": {
>         "text": "I love this thing",
>         "language" : "en
>     }
> 
> Yep.
> 
> Rob
> 
> 
> --
> Rob Sanderson
> Information Standards Advocate
> Digital Library Systems and Services
> Stanford, CA 94305


----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704