- From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:04:42 -0800
- To: Benjamin Young <bigbluehat@hypothes.is>
- Cc: W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 19 November 2015 19:05:14 UTC
An "accepted" green light label? On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Benjamin Young <bigbluehat@hypothes.is> wrote: > Good point in this issue below. I wonder if we need to have two separate > issues or issue types? or at least use labels to tell "needs discussion" > apart from "accepted" + "needs implementation." > > Thoughts? > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Rob Sanderson via GitHub < > sysbot+gh@w3.org> wrote: > >> Re-opening for tracking purposes. Telco /accepted/ the proposal, but >> it has yet to be implemented in the spec. Should keep open until that >> time. >> >> -- >> GitHub Notification of comment by azaroth42 >> Please view or discuss this issue at >> https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/100#issuecomment-158155548 >> using your GitHub account >> >> > -- Rob Sanderson Information Standards Advocate Digital Library Systems and Services Stanford, CA 94305
Received on Thursday, 19 November 2015 19:05:14 UTC