W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > November 2015

Re: Improve GitHub labelling? (was: Re: [web-annotation] Associate license with content)

From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:04:42 -0800
Message-ID: <CABevsUHfB+Hi8_R1K7O+SC5gE_QJTyKra_Rcy48pBS=Ve4WgRg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Young <bigbluehat@hypothes.is>
Cc: W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org>
An "accepted" green light label?

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Benjamin Young <bigbluehat@hypothes.is>
wrote:

> Good point in this issue below. I wonder if we need to have two separate
> issues or issue types? or at least use labels to tell "needs discussion"
> apart from "accepted" + "needs implementation."
>
> Thoughts?
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Rob Sanderson via GitHub <
> sysbot+gh@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> Re-opening for tracking purposes. Telco /accepted/ the proposal, but
>> it has yet to be implemented in the spec. Should keep open until that
>> time.
>>
>> --
>> GitHub Notification of comment by azaroth42
>> Please view or discuss this issue at
>> https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/100#issuecomment-158155548
>>  using your GitHub account
>>
>>
>


-- 
Rob Sanderson
Information Standards Advocate
Digital Library Systems and Services
Stanford, CA 94305
Received on Thursday, 19 November 2015 19:05:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:42 UTC