Sounds good. :) And an orange "needs discussion" label? On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote: > An "accepted" green light label? > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Benjamin Young <bigbluehat@hypothes.is> > wrote: > >> Good point in this issue below. I wonder if we need to have two separate >> issues or issue types? or at least use labels to tell "needs discussion" >> apart from "accepted" + "needs implementation." >> >> Thoughts? >> >> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Rob Sanderson via GitHub < >> sysbot+gh@w3.org> wrote: >> >>> Re-opening for tracking purposes. Telco /accepted/ the proposal, but >>> it has yet to be implemented in the spec. Should keep open until that >>> time. >>> >>> -- >>> GitHub Notification of comment by azaroth42 >>> Please view or discuss this issue at >>> https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/100#issuecomment-158155548 >>> using your GitHub account >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Rob Sanderson > Information Standards Advocate > Digital Library Systems and Services > Stanford, CA 94305 >Received on Thursday, 19 November 2015 19:06:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:42 UTC