W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > November 2015

Re: Improve GitHub labelling? (was: Re: [web-annotation] Associate license with content)

From: Benjamin Young <bigbluehat@hypothes.is>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 14:06:29 -0500
Message-ID: <CAE3H5FL43=H8XUG+W-WUp25b+Ne24bjKd7jCo_n8zQLo99KSOg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
Cc: W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org>
Sounds good. :) And an orange "needs discussion" label?

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
wrote:

> An "accepted" green light label?
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Benjamin Young <bigbluehat@hypothes.is>
> wrote:
>
>> Good point in this issue below. I wonder if we need to have two separate
>> issues or issue types? or at least use labels to tell "needs discussion"
>> apart from "accepted" + "needs implementation."
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Rob Sanderson via GitHub <
>> sysbot+gh@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Re-opening for tracking purposes. Telco /accepted/ the proposal, but
>>> it has yet to be implemented in the spec. Should keep open until that
>>> time.
>>>
>>> --
>>> GitHub Notification of comment by azaroth42
>>> Please view or discuss this issue at
>>> https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/100#issuecomment-158155548
>>>  using your GitHub account
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Rob Sanderson
> Information Standards Advocate
> Digital Library Systems and Services
> Stanford, CA 94305
>
Received on Thursday, 19 November 2015 19:06:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:42 UTC