W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > November 2015

Improve GitHub labelling? (was: Re: [web-annotation] Associate license with content)

From: Benjamin Young <bigbluehat@hypothes.is>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 14:00:41 -0500
Message-ID: <CAE3H5F+6g5q1Zcsga1Ure=gAZ+CP3Q=HSm-m9bYquw8BgJ1Onw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
Cc: W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org>
Good point in this issue below. I wonder if we need to have two separate
issues or issue types? or at least use labels to tell "needs discussion"
apart from "accepted" + "needs implementation."

Thoughts?

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Rob Sanderson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
wrote:

> Re-opening for tracking purposes. Telco /accepted/ the proposal, but
> it has yet to be implemented in the spec. Should keep open until that
> time.
>
> --
> GitHub Notification of comment by azaroth42
> Please view or discuss this issue at
> https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/100#issuecomment-158155548
>  using your GitHub account
>
>
Received on Thursday, 19 November 2015 19:01:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:42 UTC