W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > November 2015

RE: What happened to semantic tagging?

From: Hugo Manguinhas <Hugo.Manguinhas@europeana.eu>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 14:16:34 +0000
To: Paolo Ciccarese <paolo.ciccarese@gmail.com>
CC: W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <6D0598B03E7E9848A4287E110919B4BA011298C5@MBX-SRV-P200.wpakb.kb.nl>
Hi Paolo,

Thanks for your reply!

To be honest I am still a bit ceptic on the introduction of roles to bodies and targets in the new spec since at such level it would be more natural to understand them as a form of classification (using @type) than a motivation/role...

But coming back to the semantic tagging, how can one now distinguish between a "semantic" (machine readable, e.g. dbp) resource and a webpage (previously represented using the foaf:page property)? of course, assuming that the role tagging is used for both cases....

Best regards,

________________________________
From: Paolo Ciccarese [paolo.ciccarese@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 November 2015 14:34
To: Hugo Manguinhas
Cc: W3C Public Annotation List
Subject: Re: What happened to semantic tagging?

Hi Hugo,
Semantic tagging is still present but it is achieved through roles, if you look at the list of the changes this is the entry: Align Tags and SemanticTags with roles for body and target.

You might want to look at this section:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-annotation-model-20151015/#roles-for-external-resources

Best,
Paolo


On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 5:29 AM, Hugo Manguinhas <Hugo.Manguinhas@europeana.eu<mailto:Hugo.Manguinhas@europeana.eu>> wrote:
Dear all,

As I was looking through the recently published version of the spec, I noticed that there is no reference to semantic tagging of resources as was in the previous version. I was wondering if it was retracted from the spec, or if there is another way to model it in this spec.

Btw, I have dig up this thread from September that debates some issues around it: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-annotation/2015Sep/0184.html, but would like to ask/confirm with you if this was the direction taken...

Thanks in advance!

Best regards,


Hugo Manguinhas
Technical R&D Coordinator

T: +31 (0)70 314 0967<tel:%2B31%20%280%2970%20314%200967>
M:
E: Hugo.Manguinhas@europeana.eu<mailto:Hugo.Manguinhas@europeana.eu>
Skype: hugo.manguinhas


Be part of Europe's online cultural movement - join the Europeana Network Association: http://bit.ly/NetworkAssociation

 #AllezCulture!
Disclaimer: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this email. Please notify the sender immediately by email if you have received this email by mistake and delete this email from your system.




--
Dr. Paolo Ciccarese
Principal Knowledge and Software Engineer at PerkinElmer Innovation Lab
Assistant Professor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School
Assistant in Neuroscience at Mass General Hospital
ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5156-2703
Received on Friday, 6 November 2015 14:17:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:42 UTC