- From: Benjamin Young <bigbluehat@hypothes.is>
- Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 16:56:42 -0500
- To: Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>
- Cc: "Denenberg, Ray" <rden@loc.gov>, Web Annotation <public-annotation@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAE3H5FKF5Ljfmzq_BcBFiM5=NbThoyWtFMXsaxx49-P4Nu2=iA@mail.gmail.com>
+1 On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com> wrote: > The basic problem is with the English language, which often uses the > same word as a noun and a verb. Why don't we pick a language that doesn't > do that? ;-) –Bill Kasdorf > > > > *From:* Benjamin Young [mailto:bigbluehat@hypothes.is] > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 04, 2015 4:49 PM > *To:* Denenberg, Ray > *Cc:* Web Annotation > *Subject:* Re: Motivation: Gerund or Infinitive > > > > Well... :) > > > > It would always technically *be* a verb, but I'm not sure it'd be clear in > this JSON. > > > > ``` > > { > > "motivatedBy": "comment" > > } > > ``` > > > > Really, though, the "to comment" form could be made as a custom set of > SKOS Concepts for using the infinitive form: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-model/#extending-motivations > > > > But I'd want to see that available only as an extension and not mixed into > the `oa` namespace as that would cause yet more confusion, I'm afraid. > > > > Anyway. :) Saying the same thing different ways, so I'll let others weigh > in. > > > > Laters, > > Benjamin > > > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Denenberg, Ray <rden@loc.gov> wrote: > > From: Benjamin Young [mailto:bigbluehat@hypothes.is] > > *> oa:motivatedBy comment* > > *> has potentially different meaning than* > > *> oa:motivatedBy commenting* > > *> * > > *> The first (to me at least) implies that my annotation was motivated by > a prior* > > *> comment * > > > > Only if you take “comment” to be a noun, but the proposal is to use the > infinitive form (where the "to" part of the infinitive is implied) thus it > would always be understood to be a verb. > > > > So: > > > > oa:motivatedBy "comment" > > says: > > " motivatedBy to comment" > > > > Admittedly this doesn't sound as good as if the predicate were (as we > thought yesterday) oa:motivation. in that case it would say: > "motivation: to comment". Actually I’d like to change to predicate (back) > to oa:motivation. > > > > Ray > > > > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2015 21:57:10 UTC