- From: BigBlueHat via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 21:24:09 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
@shepazu your quote from earlier contains access control language (emphasis added): > we may wish to add a normative requirement that a UA SHOULD honor a stated restriction, > whether that is group or some other well-defined "audience" (I can > imagine that **students might not have access to instructor annotations** > on a textbook, for example). If we were to add such a normative requirement, it should not be at the UA level, but at the protocol level--which I think has been said a few times now... Consequently, if we reword this issue and document requirements for groups as a thing in relation to the protocol doc, then I think we can get back on track. -- GitHub Notification of comment by BigBlueHat Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/119#issuecomment-161788893 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 3 December 2015 21:24:12 UTC