- From: Erik Wilde via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 00:26:30 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
i don't want to hold up this work, so i will rest my case. but i am still confused why there even is a "protocol spec" talking about a server, and not just a mediatype/vocabulary spec. for example, right now it seems everything hinges on the fact that everything must be implemented by "the server". what if somebody for whatever reason serves different resources from different servers (physically or by switching domain names in some way)? does that make such an implementation non-conforming because there isn't one server satisfying all requirements? REST would say that such an implementation should be fine, and only broken clients (not following links but instead string-processing URIs) would have problems. but this is a very high-level question and i don't think one that can be discussed productively on github. so from a process point of view, feel free to consider this issue resolved. -- GitHub Notif of comment by dret See https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/51#issuecomment-135216418
Received on Thursday, 27 August 2015 00:26:32 UTC