- From: Sarven Capadisli via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 15:26:10 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
1. The directionality of 'thing has something' is obvious I think, is it not? The *subject* is the one with the property. Are there any inverse properties in OA? 2. Capturing the directionality is done by terms being self-descriptive (e.g., domains, ranges), not based on the *human-readable* string. I hope that people are not relying on what the string's are on the terms but rather their actual definitions. 2. The use of `has` is not consistently carried out e.g., proposed `oa:text`. I'm proposing this because I find the prefix unnecessary/cumbersome, unless someone can point me at the terms in which the direction is in other way around - happy to retract in that case. Failing that, I suggest to strive for more consistency on the directionality. Naturally, the ontology is what matters and lives on. JSON-LD context is merely on the backdrop. -- GitHub Notif of comment by csarven See https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/70#issuecomment-134249010
Received on Monday, 24 August 2015 15:26:11 UTC