- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 12:24:14 +0100
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Tim Cole <t-cole3@illinois.edu>, W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org>
This is part of JSON-LD Compaction - which I believe do not include @type and @id aliasing - but serializers are of course free to use "type" and "id" if they so please. http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld-api/#compaction-algorithms Testing the new context in the JSON-LD Playground http://json-ld.org/playground/#/gist/c6d082e9ded2ebc5bd4f I get out: { "@context: { ...}, "id": "http://example.com/ann1", "@type": "Annotation", "body": { "id": "http://example.com/body1" } So there "id" was mapped, but not "type" BTW - I was unable to use http://www.w3.org/ns/anno.jsonld directly as @context as it does not provide CORS headers, you might want to fix that. Also there is no https equivalent? On 16 August 2015 at 06:28, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > Hi Tim, > >> On 16 Aug 2015, at 24:18 , Timothy Cole <t-cole3@illinois.edu> wrote: >> >> Ivan- >> >> As discussed the changes to @context mean that agents creating JSON-LD can use type instead of @type and id instead of @id -- which is good, but what about when annotations stored as RDF are to be disseminated in JSON-LD? >> >> I'm not clear from what I can discover from the JSON-LD Processing Algorithms and API document and from the test reports done for JSON-LD exactly how @context mappings are used when serializing RDF as JSON-LD (it does look that there is provision for applying @context, just not sure I understand all the rules, and when there is a choice -- as there would be for @type/type and @id/id, I would assume that the transforming agent has some discretion). > > I do not really know. I *think* that this is entirely the discretion of the conversion tool; I would expect good tools to be able to take a @context file and make a maximum use of it. But I would actually be surprised if this was standardized. Well, maybe the framing tool do that, but those are not standard. > >> >> Is this another question for Greg, or do you or James know, or does someone else? > > Asking Gregg is definitely a good idea. He knows JSON-LD inside out, having also make a complete implementation around it (and having a great experience in RDF tools, too). > >> >> Or maybe we have to provide libraries for this? >> > > I do not think so. > >> Or maybe this is not an issue? > > Well… I do not think this is an active issue for us. > > @context is really there to simplify the JSON format of our data items. Where it *may* become an issue is if a fully RDF-based system has annotation data and wants to communicate/export the data with a pure JSON based annotations environment: they would have to export in the restricted JSON-LD format that we define. That may involve framing, etc, and that also means using @context. But that is mostly an implementation problem, not a specification one… (unless we want to define the details of framing in the standard, but I am not convinced we should do that). And I am not sure that scenario is a really realistic one, to be honest. Where I would expect LD to play a role is *consuming* existing annotation data into some LD environment (data integration with other types of data), where this problem does not occur, and not the other way round. > > My 2 cents… > > Cheers > > Ivan > >> >> I ask not only as regards type and id, but because there is additional aliasing in @context we could consider to make the JSON-LD serialization seem more natural. >> >> By the way, I appreciate you fixing up the Wiki page examples. Thank you. >> >> -Tim Cole >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org] >> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 11:17 AM >> To: W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org> >> Subject: @context file >> >> I have made the changes we agreed upon on the @context file, both on the github repo and on /ns. >> >> Ivan >> >> >> ---- >> Ivan Herman, W3C >> Digital Publishing Activity Lead >> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >> mobile: +31-641044153 >> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C > Digital Publishing Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 > > > > -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, eScience Lab School of Computer Science The University of Manchester http://soiland-reyes.com/stian/work/ http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
Received on Wednesday, 19 August 2015 11:25:04 UTC