- From: Rob Sanderson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 15:32:06 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
Dr Dr, it hurts when I use literal bodies...
... Don't do that then :smile_cat:
But regardless, "comment" can trivially be turned into {"value":
"comment"} without expressing format or language. I'm sure there'll
be a lot of bodies that have neither, nor any other property or
relationship. As clients find the information valuable and will make
decisions based on it, it believe it should be a SHOULD. Note that
any other relationship could be added to a body as well, such as
creator or subject or license or whatever else. We don't mention them
in the model because (a) there's too many to discuss, (b) we'd be
picking sides on things outside of our scope, and (c) clients are
unlikely to make rendering decisions based on them.
--
GitHub Notif of comment by azaroth42
See
https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/63#issuecomment-131150818
Received on Friday, 14 August 2015 15:32:09 UTC