- From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2015 07:14:37 -0700
- To: t-cole3@illinois.edu
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Web Annotation <public-annotation@w3.org>, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
- Message-ID: <CABP7Rbc9BZNTXq0_FxyM3D5ndX9su-yiMMO0D+bK26-qC-PYjg@mail.gmail.com>
Using @vocab essentially makes it difficult to impossible to use your context with any other context without experiencing unintended and unexpected results. I definitely recommend treading carefully. On Aug 8, 2015 10:54 AM, "Timothy Cole" <t-cole3@illinois.edu> wrote: > Ivan- > > I'm going off of the following paragraph from Section 6.5 of the JSON-LD > 1.0 Recommendation [http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/#type-coercion], which > says: > > ***Type coercion is specified within an expanded term definition using the > @type key. The value of this key expands to an IRI. Alternatively, the > keywords @id or @vocab may be used as value to indicate that within the > body of a JSON-LD document, a string value of a term coerced to @id or > @vocab is to be interpreted as an IRI. The difference between @id and > @vocab is how values are expanded to absolute IRIs. @vocab first tries to > expand the value by interpreting it as term. If no matching term is found > in the active context, it tries to expand it as compact IRI or absolute IRI > if there's a colon in the value; otherwise, it will expand the value using > the active context's vocabulary mapping, if present, or by interpreting it > as relative IRI. Values coerced to @id in contrast are expanded as compact > IRI or absolute IRI if a colon is present; otherwise, they are interpreted > as relative IRI.*** > > Assuming that the Range of oa:motivatedBy is meant to include terms > defined in our context document, e.g.: > > bookmarking: "oa:bookmarking" > > then we should use @vocab. This allows the correct mapping of the > following line in the json-ld instance: > > "motivation": "bookmarking" > > If we leave type as @id in our context document, then we are limited to > using only this form in the json-ld instance: > > "motivation": "oa:bookmarking" > > Note, the latter form does work correctly even if we use @vocab -- which > also means that other communities can still extend our oa:Motivation > ontology in their own namespaces, but the former form without the namespace > prefix on the term does not. > > Is there a downside to using @vocab that I am not recognizing? > > Thanks, > > Tim Cole > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org] > Sent: Friday, August 07, 2015 11:09 PM > To: Tim Cole <t-cole3@illinois.edu> > Cc: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>; W3C Public Annotation List < > public-annotation@w3.org> > Subject: Re: JSON-LD Context > > Tim, > > I am just the messenger… and my JSON-LD is a bit rusty. But my first > reaction is that what is there, ie, the first line is correct. What it says > (I think) is that the value (range) of 'motivation' is a URI reference in > RDF jargon, and that the property itself is oa:motivatedBy… > > Ivan > > > On 07 Aug 2015, at 23:39 , Timothy Cole <t-cole3@illinois.edu> wrote: > > > > Rob, Ivan- > > > > Shouldn't this line in the context document: > > "motivation": {"@type":"@id", "@id" : "oa:motivatedBy"}, > > > > Be this instead: > > "motivation": {"@type":"@vocab", "@id" : "oa:motivatedBy"}, > > > > This seems to be needed in order for motivation values without the oa: > prefix to be recognized as in the oa ontology. > > > > Regardless, agree with Randall that it is very helpful to have this up. > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Tim Cole > > > > > > > > From: Randall Leeds [mailto:randall@bleeds.info] > > Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 6:42 PM > > To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>; Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> > > Cc: W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org> > > Subject: Re: JSON-LD Context > > > > That looks wonderful. > > > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:12 PM Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > >> There were some minor syntax problems that I took care of (and pushed > >> on the repo); the files are now also available as > >> > >> http://www.w3.org/ns/anno.jsonld > >> > >> Ivan > >> > >> > On 06 Aug 2015, at 24:54 , Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > A draft context, that we can put up on w3.org with Ivan's help: > >> > > >> > http://w3c.github.io/web-annotation/jsonld/anno.jsonld > >> > > >> > Please cast an eye over it and see if there's any bugs :) > >> > > >> > As we haven't decided yet on the property names for the > relationships, I've left them alone. I did add the classes, with some > hopefully friendly names, per issues. Also xsd, xsi, iana, and ldp from > Protocol and even further issues. > >> > > >> > Rob > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Rob Sanderson > >> > Information Standards Advocate > >> > Digital Library Systems and Services Stanford, CA 94305 > >> > >> > >> ---- > >> Ivan Herman, W3C > >> Digital Publishing Activity Lead > >> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > >> mobile: +31-641044153 > >> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 > >> > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C > Digital Publishing Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 > > > > > > >
Received on Sunday, 9 August 2015 14:15:08 UTC