Re: Search requirements

[not as chair]

Earlier I suggested that search by target domain (and possibility also  target domain + partial path match )

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch

www.fjhirsch.com
@fjhirsch

> On Apr 26, 2015, at 2:59 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> To make progress on the search part of protocol, some proposed types of search that should be supported:
> 
> Search by:
> 
> * exact target URI
> * ... where the target URI might be in the hasSource of a SpecificResource
> * ... ignoring fragments
> 
> * exact body URI
> * ... where the body URI might be in hasSource of a SpecificResource
> * ... or in foaf:page / skos:exactMatch of a SemanticTag
> * ... ignoring fragments
> * class of body (Tag, SemTag, Text, ...)
> * exact body content
> * keyword(s) in body content
> * phrase in body content
> * language of body content
> * format of body content
> 
> * annotator URI
> * annotation's date
> * motivation
> 
> Ordered By:
> 
> * Date created/modified
> * Position in target resource (e.g. first annotations first)
> * Relevance to the query
> 
> 
> Am I missing anything?
> 
> -- 
> Rob Sanderson
> Information Standards Advocate
> Digital Library Systems and Services
> Stanford, CA 94305

Received on Monday, 27 April 2015 19:06:32 UTC