Re: Paging, filtering, and sorting

Thanks Den, but…

> On 16 Apr 2015, at 14:53 , Denenberg, Ray <rden@loc.gov> wrote:
> 
>> From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org]
>> I was just wondering whether we need the whole CQL for our purposes.
> 
> Absolutely not, in fact the minimum requirement is quite barebones.  See http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/companionSpecs/baseProfile.html   and look at level 0.  Most likely we would want to support at least level 1.  Certainly not level 2.
> 

…there is a link in that document to:

http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/sru-1-2/cql.html#baseprofile

but it goes to a 404:-(

Ivan


> That's for CQL.
> 
> For SRU ...
> 
> Is
>> there a controlled way to define some sort of a profile for the purpose of
>> annotation? Our structures are relatively simple, so I think starting with a
>> relatively simple query/filter language that would then be combined with
>> paging may be enough. I do not think we should impose on annotation
>> servers the obligation to implement the whole of
> 
> 
> Note that the paging would be a function of SRU, not CQL.  SRU minimum conformance, while not easy to explain in a paragraph (standards mumbo jumbo), is just as simple as CQL   What you describe, "a  relatively simple query/filter language that would then be combined with  paging ..."    would be good enough.
> 
> Ray


----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704