RE: [general] Topic Interest Poll

That's an amazingly even distribution! Which is an indication that the makeup of the WG is nice and broad wrt perspectives represented. A Very Good Thing.
--Bill Kasdorf

From: Robert Sanderson [mailto:azaroth42@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 2:25 PM
To: Benjamin Young
Cc: Web Annotation
Subject: Re: [general] Topic Interest Poll


Thanks all for your responses.

The summary to date is:

Total: 28 responses

+1s per topic:
Model:  15
Vocabulary: 15
Serialization: 13
HTTP API: 10
Client API: 14
Robust Anchoring: 13

Other than the chairs, the next highest total per person was 4 +1s, which was 6 of the responses.

I can share the actual matrix if that would be interesting.

Rob



On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Benjamin Young <byoung@bigbluehat.com<mailto:byoung@bigbluehat.com>> wrote:
Name: Benjamin Young
IRC Nick: bigbluehat
Abstract Model: +0
Vocabulary: +0
Serialization: +1
HTTP API: +1
Client API: +1
Robust Anchoring: +0

From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com<mailto:azaroth42@gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 5:22 PM
To: Web Annotation <public-annotation@w3.org<mailto:public-annotation@w3.org>>
Subject: [general] Topic Interest Poll
Resent-From: <public-annotation@w3.org<mailto:public-annotation@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 5:22 PM


Dear all,

As part of the WG call today we had a quick straw poll of who was interested in which topics that are part of our chartered work.  The results were very interesting, but of course only reflect those people who were on the call.

Please if you could reply to this message with the following template filled out, I'll collect additional interest and then circulate the results.  This will help us with several aspects of managing the work, including prioritization of the topics, the possibility of having separate calls on separate topics, which areas we need to solicit additional participation for, and so forth.

In the template, give a +1 for a deliverable if you are interested in actively engaging and discussing that topic; a +0 if you would pay attention to the topic if it was being discussed but it's less important; and a -1 if the topic is of no interest to you at all (you wouldn't join a call that was discussing it).  There's no harm or shame in not being interested in everything -- excluding the chairs, none of the current participants from the call have more than four +1s, and two only have one.


## Template

Name:
IRC Nick:
Abstract Model:
Vocabulary:
Serialization:
HTTP API:
Client API:
Robust Anchoring:

The topics are described in the charter: http://www.w3.org/annotation/charter/


Best,
  RFID (Rob, Frederick, Ivan, Doug)

--
Rob Sanderson
Technology Collaboration Facilitator
Digital Library Systems and Services
Stanford, CA 94305



--
Rob Sanderson
Technology Collaboration Facilitator
Digital Library Systems and Services
Stanford, CA 94305