Re: [general] Topic Interest Poll

Thanks all for your responses.

The summary to date is:

Total: 28 responses

+1s per topic:
Model:  15
Vocabulary: 15
Serialization: 13
HTTP API: 10
Client API: 14
Robust Anchoring: 13

Other than the chairs, the next highest total per person was 4 +1s, which
was 6 of the responses.

I can share the actual matrix if that would be interesting.

Rob



On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Benjamin Young <byoung@bigbluehat.com>
wrote:

>  Name: Benjamin Young
> IRC Nick: bigbluehat
> Abstract Model: +0
> Vocabulary: +0
> Serialization: +1
> HTTP API: +1
> Client API: +1
> Robust Anchoring: +0
>
>   From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
> Date: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 5:22 PM
> To: Web Annotation <public-annotation@w3.org>
> Subject: [general] Topic Interest Poll
> Resent-From: <public-annotation@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 5:22 PM
>
>
>  Dear all,
>
>  As part of the WG call today we had a quick straw poll of who was
> interested in which topics that are part of our chartered work.  The
> results were very interesting, but of course only reflect those people who
> were on the call.
>
>  Please if you could reply to this message with the following template
> filled out, I'll collect additional interest and then circulate the
> results.  This will help us with several aspects of managing the work,
> including prioritization of the topics, the possibility of having separate
> calls on separate topics, which areas we need to solicit additional
> participation for, and so forth.
>
>  In the template, give a +1 for a deliverable if you are interested in
> actively engaging and discussing that topic; a +0 if you would pay
> attention to the topic if it was being discussed but it's less important;
> and a -1 if the topic is of no interest to you at all (you wouldn't join a
> call that was discussing it).  There's no harm or shame in not being
> interested in everything -- excluding the chairs, none of the current
> participants from the call have more than four +1s, and two only have one.
>
>
>  ## Template
>
>  Name:
> IRC Nick:
> Abstract Model:
> Vocabulary:
> Serialization:
> HTTP API:
> Client API:
> Robust Anchoring:
>
>  The topics are described in the charter:
> http://www.w3.org/annotation/charter/
>
>  Best,
>   RFID (Rob, Frederick, Ivan, Doug)
>
>  --
> Rob Sanderson
> Technology Collaboration Facilitator
> Digital Library Systems and Services
> Stanford, CA 94305
>



-- 
Rob Sanderson
Technology Collaboration Facilitator
Digital Library Systems and Services
Stanford, CA 94305