- From: Ben De Meester <ben.demeester@ugent.be>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:17:45 +0100
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>, W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJ-O9Tt7hQz=P1GhipeYWpOnZRMe-tdLDHXW5eZCxdiT+HkrnA@mail.gmail.com>
+1 Ben De Meester Researcher Semantic Web Ghent University - iMinds - Multimedia Lab Faculty of Engineering and Architecture Department of Electronics and Information Systems Gaston Crommenlaan 8 bus 201, B-9050 Ledeberg-Ghent, Belgium t: +32 9 331 49 59 e: ben.demeester@ugent.be URL: http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be 2014-11-18 13:33 GMT+01:00 Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>: > Editorial comments: > > - at the moment, the way one chooses between a json-ld or a turtle syntax > in the example is simply by moving the cursor on the label, instead of > explicitly clicking on them. I think this is a fairly disturbing behaviour, > people may suddenly see a syntax they may not even be familiar with... Can > we change this? > > - In Section 4.4.1, the text says: "And the Specific Resource (spres1) to > be styled would have the property in the Annotation's RDF" with an example > in turtle. > > I believe this is a leftover. This is one of the two occurrences of the > string "RDF" in the current text. The text will not be understandable for > somebody coming from outside the RDF world, and not using the turtle > syntax. Should be changed a bit. > > - Section 4.1, "The Specifier's description MAY be conveyed as an external > or embedded resource, or as RDF properties within the graph": the reference > to "RDF Properties" may again be difficult to understand for outsiders of > RDF. This should also be rephrased. > > These are all editorial comments, though, and we all know that a FPWD will > still evolve, so +1 on publication in any case. > > Ivan > > > > On 17 Nov 2014, at 15:35 , Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com> wrote: > > > > This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a First Public Working > Draft (FPWD) of the ‘Web Annotation Data Model’ produced by the Annotation > Working Group, and adopting the short name of “annotation-model” for this > specification [1] > > > > The publication draft is here: > http://w3c.github.io/web-annotation/model_fpwd/static.html > > > > Please review and note any concerns on the public list ( > public-annotation @ w3.org ). This CfC ends in two weeks, Tuesday 2 > December 2014. > > > > Please note that a FPWD is just that, a first public draft, so it need > not be perfect and subsequent change is possible; publishing this draft > should give it further review and attention. > > > > Please respond to this CfC (even a +1 is useful). Silence will be > considered agreement. The anticipated publication date is 14 December. > > > > Thanks > > > > regards, Frederick and Rob > > > > Frederick Hirsch, Nokia > > Rob Sanderson, Stanford > > Co-Chairs W3C Web Annotation WG > > > > [1] please note those on the teleconference 12 November agreed to this > short name: http://www.w3.org/2014/11/12-annotation-minutes.html#item04 > > > > > > > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C > Digital Publishing Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2014 13:18:39 UTC