Re: FPWD comment - literals, data types and language tags

Dear all,

I like to express my strong support for Antoine’s and Ivan’s arguments. 

Having to explain to developers with an RDF background why this triple

> <> oa:body "hi"@en . 

is illegal in OA would be a royal pain.  I think a syntax variant like the one suggested by Ivan that avoids us having to explain this would be worth investigating. The current text, that just declares it illegal without explanations just raises questions without providing any understanding of the issue. (and I do not think it would survive the REC track process anyway).


Received on Monday, 15 December 2014 09:37:02 UTC