- From: Erik Newton <eriknewton@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 May 2026 13:54:13 -0500
- To: public-aivs@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CALj9GSo3S0dss3d4T56s_uZs_ZdsfDDNgBuRmTyXt1nrmOdGGw@mail.gmail.com>
Takayuki, welcome to AIVS, and thank you for the substantive proposal. The framing of agent.json as identity card, AIVS as tamper-proof action log, and AQG as reputation score on delegation outcomes is a clean separation of concerns; it gives the group three distinct surfaces to consider rather than one tangled bundle. I'm folding both proposals into the first-meeting agenda as candidate work items. A couple of questions members might want to discuss in advance here: 1. agent.json vs A2A AgentCard and MCP server.json: where exactly is the convergence point, and is there appetite from the existing schema authors to fold under a unified manifest? 2. AQG anti-gaming guarantees: what's the threat model for adversarial delegation graphs (Sybil clusters, collusion rings) at the scale you're targeting, and where does the formal analysis sit? Looking forward to hearing more in this thread or at the meeting. Best, Erik Erik Newton
Received on Monday, 4 May 2026 18:54:19 UTC