Re: Great Community Engagement Reader

yep, well look at it as COGAI (like any other AI) is made up of KR

On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 5:29 AM Adeel <aahmad1811@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I would think there is some carry over of abstraction dependency from KR
> into CogAI.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Adeel
>
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 at 02:50, Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you Adeel, the cognitive architecture is done in the cog-ai CG
>> however, the community engagement resource may be useful there as well
>> i
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 9:27 PM Adeel <aahmad1811@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I would be interested in getting involved in the development and
>>> implementation aspect of the cognitive architecture to test the theory in
>>> any specific publication as part of what this community releases as output.
>>> We can then collaborate further on publications. I think group involvement
>>> will likely increase if there is something tangible to look at and
>>> reference as a point of testing the theory. And, possibly a drive for
>>> specification. I find myself skeptical on paper publications unless there
>>> is some artefact associated with it to prove whether it would work.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Adeel
>>>
>>> On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 at 03:50, Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Owen
>>>> thank you-
>>>>
>>>> Regarding your suggestion that what is needed is tools, I am not sure
>>>>
>>>> There are plenty of tools for engagement - including your own which may
>>>> partly fulfil that purpose
>>>>
>>>> What we have found over years of community work is that there are
>>>> individuals and organisations
>>>> that take a lot out from the community - in terms of knowledge, ideas,
>>>> resources, shared freely and without hidden agendas, for the joy of
>>>> sharing,  and use the same for personal gains (career, funding publications
>>>> that do not credit the source of what they write etc) without ever giving
>>>> anything back
>>>>
>>>> In my view, what we need more of is honesty and genuine interest in the
>>>> common good
>>>> something that is very rare,
>>>> We keep at it nonetheless, magic still happens between the cracks
>>>> I am hoping someone earning a salary elsewhere but utterly bored with
>>>> their life and a few spare cycles may become involved as community
>>>> engagement manager with this C
>>>>
>>>> p
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 10:34 AM Owen Ambur <owen.ambur@verizon.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Paola, when you're ready to share your proposal, I'll look forward to
>>>>> learning if it lends itself to rendition as a performance plan in StratML
>>>>> Part 2 format.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the meantime, your message prompted me to convert to StratML Part 1
>>>>> format the about statements for CSCCE & Community Initiatives at
>>>>> https://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#CI4
>>>>>
>>>>> As far as the challenge of engagement is concerned, it seems to me
>>>>> what's needed is pretty clear and relatively simple -- online tools that
>>>>> make it easy for users to contribute to the realization of objectives of
>>>>> particular interest to them:
>>>>>
>>>>> For those who care enough, the first step is to clarify and share
>>>>> their objectives in an open, machine-readable format.
>>>>>
>>>>> The second is to develop services making it relatively easy for users
>>>>> to share and discover objectives of special interest to them.
>>>>>
>>>>> And the third step is to provide services enabling users to
>>>>> *contribute* to the realization of common and complementary
>>>>> objectives *as best their time, resources, and expertise allow*.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If those steps are well executed, the results (or lack thereof) will
>>>>> speak efficiently and effectively for themselves.  Otherwise we can just
>>>>> keep writing scholarly articles and exchanging messages like this.
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW, CSCCE's guidebook could also be rendered as a model performance
>>>>> plan for community managers but I am not yet sufficienty motivated to
>>>>> do that for them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Owen Ambur
>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/owenambur/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 11:43:21 AM EDT, Paola Di Maio <
>>>>> paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Greetings folks
>>>>>
>>>>> This CG has over seventy members, but low member engagement. It would
>>>>> be great if someone would take up the challenge to engage the community base
>>>>>
>>>>> I ll be sharing a proposal soon - waiting for the scholarly
>>>>> publication currently with the publisher before sharing the gist of what I
>>>>> have been working on - but obviously everyone is welcome to come up with
>>>>> suggestions and plans on how to take things forward.
>>>>>
>>>>> Courtesy of the CSCCE, a great resource to stimulate interest in the
>>>>> role (volunteer) and recommended reading for everyone interested in
>>>>> community engagement
>>>>>
>>>>> *The CSCCE Skills Wheel – Five core competencies and 45 skills to
>>>>> describe the role of the community engagement manager in STEM.*
>>>>> https://zenodo.org/record/4437294#.Y07FXExBzrd
>>>>> *This guidebook is intended to be a brief, practical introduction to
>>>>> scientific community manager roles and provide a starting point for
>>>>> discussing common questions about them.*
>>>>>
>>>>> Pdm
>>>>>
>>>>