Re: Socially Situated AI; Introducing HELM

great you find the reference of interest

btw- somewhere in the long text they suggest that human in the loop
is better defined as humans at the center of AI
but they are just milking the last drop of the argument whatever way they
want to define it

- humans are by definition at the center of AI since they have developed it

On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 12:21 AM carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>
wrote:

> This is a useful reference for our Human-in-Loop discussion ... I will add
> the following as initial Topics..
>
>    - Instruction tuning, the practice of fine-tuning 'Models' with human
>    feedback,
>    - A scenario consists of a task, a domain (consisting of what genre
>    the text is, who wrote it, and when it was written),
>    - 7 metrics - accuracy, calibration, robustness, fairness, bias,
>    toxicity, and efficiency
>
> Carl Mattocks
>
> It was a pleasure to clarify
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 9:30 AM Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I am glad to see Stanford conceding that humans must remain at the center
>> of AI.  There is A LOT
>> to dig into relevant to this CG- what are the implications for us here?
>>
>> https://hai.stanford.edu/news/language-models-are-changing-ai-we-need-understand-them
>>
>>
>>