Re: MOT Graphic Language

The goals and objectives implicit in Paquette's wall of text are now 
available in StratML format at 
https://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#GOML4LE


I'm copying Kranthi because MOT reminds me of his ThoughtFlow 
application and I am looking forward to learning how it might be applied 
in support of the vision of the StratML standard:  A worldwide web of 
intentions, stakeholders, and results.

Owen


On 5/24/2022 10:33 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
> Not new, but v good read,
> I plan to leverage some concepts
>
>
> Graphical Ontology Modeling Language for Learning Environments
> GILBERT PAQUETTE*
> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228639039_Graphical_ontology_modeling_language_for_learning_environments

>
> In the last fifteen years, our main goal has been to synthesize and 
> combine
> various forms of graphical representations that are useful for educational
> modeling and knowledge management, using an integrated graphical formal-
> ism. We have shown that very different kinds of representation, conceptual
> maps, flowcharts, decision trees and others, can all be modeled more 
> precise-
> ly, using the MOT graphic language based on typed objects (concept, proce-
> dures, principles, facts) as well as few typed links. With this set of 
> primitive
> graphic symbols, it has been possible to build very different graphic 
> models,
> from simple taxonomies to ontologies, more or less complex learning 
> designs,
> delivery process, decision systems, and methods.
> Recent developments have led to two specialisations of the graphic lan-
> guage. The first one is a powerful, yet simple graphic language to build
> ontologies for a knowledge domain. The second one enables to model learn-
> ing designs and scenarios in a standardized and computable way. The 
> associ-
> ation between both kinds of models specifies the central part of a 
> learning
> environment at the design phase, and enables its delivery to learners 
> and edu-
> cators. In the final section, I assert that knowledge representation 
> for educa-
> tion should be graphic, user-friendly, general, scalable, declarative, 
> standard-
> ized and computable. Adiscussion of these criteria conclude