- From: LJ.Garcia <lj.garcia.co@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 15:11:28 +0100
- To: Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
- Cc: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAPZUG=Bct+uWkVTrG2FRF0T-9Vc6Th91syKAtkob8w6Cm9snew@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Paola, all, I work with semantic web and linked data in life sciences so I guess I am one of those that find knowledge graphs as a good KR. I use semantic approaches to combine data and do some knowledge discovery / data analytics there, so I understand better the data and what I can get out of it. I have not been able to get much information about StrathML, google seems to get confused with the term and does not give me much. Any link you can provide? Regarding a schema for ethical AI, I could be interested in it but would need to understand better what you mean. I have worked with schema.org to add markup/metadata to webpages. Let's suppose you expose your AI tool on a portal or so, would the schema you have in mind describe the AI tool with some properties regarding ethical aspects? Regards, On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 1:15 AM Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com> wrote: > LJ, > please tell us about your topic and your interest in AI KR > > I ll be posting some updates soon at my end > My vision for KR is that is pretty much the center of the known universe, > in the sense that > humans relate to the world around them through cognition > From KR depends everything that is shared/collective, that is made > explicit and communicated and subject to norms > That is quite a lot. Now that some level of AI is used in every system KR > is becoming more important > But it has not evolved much. I dont think kg (Knowledge Graphs) are > reliable KR methods. Do you have opinions > on that? > I dont need KR in the same way for our own internal world > this is perhaps more the realm of Cognitive AI > > I am pursuing my vision by pitching papers - had a few abstracts and > papers and talks on the subject > accepted, and started this group in the hope the message trickles > It has trickled, as people have started picking up on the topics we share > here and discuss them > elsewhere, for some reason :-) > > There is a lot of interesting material and I think I ll start by > publishing a concept map of what is going on > > StrathML is great but fits a bit like a straightjacket for my madness at > the moment :-) > > The last meaningful ideas was a schema for Ethical AI repos written in > StrathML or something > which i hope goes ahead > > > pdm > > PDM > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 7:07 PM LJ.Garcia <lj.garcia.co@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Paola, >> >> Thanks for your reply. StratML meetings would be too specific for me, >> great to learn but out of my topic right now to not enough time to engage. >> I will keep a closer eye to the mailing list to learn more from >> discussions and so on. If I see I can contribute somehow, I will do so. >> >> Thanks! >> >> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 3:22 AM Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> LJ >>> Thanks for the PIng >>> >>> Carl and Owen have been organising meetings focussed on a specific topic >>> StrathML >>> but we can set up meetings anytime, with any focus- >>> Let us know what you work on, what is your interest and vision for the >>> participation in this group >>> and we maybe set up a call to focus on any topic that may be of interest >>> to you and others >>> >>> PDM >>> >>> >>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Virus-free. >>> www.avast.com >>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> >>> <#m_4138751991099088002_m_-3762926692016067577_m_-8267902609057381427_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 10:13 PM LJ.Garcia <lj.garcia.co@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Dear all, >>>> >>>> I have partially followed discussions going on on the mailing list but >>>> this year would like to be more active. I think there is a monthly meeting? >>>> If yes, could you please remind me the details? >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> >>>
Received on Tuesday, 19 January 2021 14:11:53 UTC