Re: AIKR Value Chain / Quality Control

You can take Tau one or two levels higher. In my paper in progress "A Smart City Framework For Disease Control and Prevention Using Sensor, Tracing, Tracking, Wearable and Medical Technologies" category theory and complex adaptive systems are used to make sense of processes, data and actors.
Mediating processes are necessary to provide causal chain linked transfers of relevant data and require seamless interfacing and bridging.
This will become one of the most important areas of research and development in AI and will rewrite the book on formal languages and coding.

Milton Ponson
GSM: +297 747 8280
PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development 

    On Wednesday, September 23, 2020, 12:37:53 PM ADT, Kilian Kunst <kilian@idni.org> wrote:  
 
 That's right. We speak about the Internet of Languages in our whitepaper:
After establishing the logics that support laws, we have to come down to a concretelanguage. However we reject the concept of “universal language” and postulate thatno single language is adequate for all purposes. We acknowledge that many languagesshould not only coexist and be mutually interchangeable, but they should also have theability to evolve with time. We therefore come up with a meta-language that is capableof defining new languages, but then, one might claim that we solved nothing, and eventhough we reject the idea of universal language, we still came up with a universal metalanguage. To this end we require the meta-language to be able to self-interpret and bythat redefine itself and change with time. We therefore achieve a situation in which thechoice of language doesn’t matter while even the meta-language is not fixed.The internet of languages is therefore a set of translators. It is important to notethat we do not at all consider translations or even processing of natural languages, andour scope is restricted to formal languages. Once a translator from language X to language Y is written and submitted into the internet of languages, and similarly atranslator from language Y to language Z, we then get a translator from X to Z “forfree”. This gives rise to calling it an “internet” of languages.


| 
|  | 
| Kilian Kunst |
| Community Manager | Intelligent Decentralized Networks Initiatives LTD |
| site:  www.IDNI.org |
| email:  Kilian@idni.org |

 | 
| 

 |

 |

 |



On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 4:44 PM carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com> wrote:



Communities (CoInterest / CoPractice / CoResults) are not always bureaucratic organizations ..some have schemas (& taxonomies)  that add structure to discussions. As does DMAIC - by ordering the topics to be acted upon..  Hopefully this can be true for Tau Communities.
When the Tau community intends to make changes to the network code, rules or protocols, they will simply need to express these opinions and perspectives in a compatible language over the network. The self defining logic of the Tau blockchain network will enable it to detect the consensus among these opinions and automatically amend its own code to reflect this consensus from block to block.  https://www.idni.org/


It was a pleasure toclarify


On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 10:11 PM Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote:

what I mean is that six sigma and other related methodsare organisational praocesses, ie are applied within a closed system
the development of KR however is distributed, and cognition does not work as a bureaucratic organisationthe entire KR lifecycle does not typically happens (afaik) within a closed system and involves entities (such as cognition, interpretation)which are not bureaucratic,
But it could be interesting to see how such a management process can be applied to the outcome of a mixed knowledgelifecycle process such as KR,  Maybe that process/schema should evolve further as well
P
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 9:50 AM Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote:

Thank you
I think it makes sense to apply quality management processes to KR (if I understand you right)
Wonder perhaps if it is worth to clarify further how this process (which is an organisational tool)
can be applied to the knowledge lifecycle (from cognition to artefact)
p
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 1:10 AM carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com> wrote:

Regarding our discussion today about schema for 'publishing knowledge (representation)' that would have same multi-level Value Chain based on Strategies & [exploration, exploitation  and evaluation]....   note: you messaged : The "knowledge-value_chain_A_conceptual_framework  " is now available in StratML format at https://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#KVC
The mission, vision, goals and strategies of a public health organization or social enterprise drive the knowledge-value chain. The higher the knowledge performance related to dyadic capabilities, the higher the value generated (Fig. 1).  

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6869769_The_knowledge-value_chain_A_conceptual_framework_for_knowledge_translation_in_health 
For consideration I also propose that ... to introduce Knowledge(representation) Quality controls we would use Exploration / Exploitation / Evaluationin a matrix cross-checking with  Define, measure, analyze, improve, and control (DMAIC) ..a data-driven quality strategy used to improve processes. .. It is an integral part of a Six Sigma initiative, but in general can be implemented as a standalone quality improvement procedure or as part of other process improvement initiatives such as lean. 



| KRVC/Quality | Exploration |  Exploitation | Evaluation |
| Define |   |   |   |
| Measure  |   |   |   |
| Analyze |   |   |   |
| Improve |   |   |   |
| Control |   |   |   |



| Define the problem, improvement activity, opportunity for improvement, the project goals, and customer (internal and external) requirements. |
| Project charter to define the focus, scope, direction, and motivation for the improvement team |
| Voice of the customer to understand feedback from current and future customers indicating offerings that satisfy, delight, and dissatisfy them |
| Value stream map to provide an overview of an entire process, starting and finishing at the customer, and analyzing what is required to meet customer needs |
| Measure process performance. |
| Process map for recording the activities performed as part of a process |
| Capability analysis to assess the ability of a process to meet specifications |
| Pareto chart to analyze the frequency of problems or causes |
| Analyze the process to determine root causes of variation and poor performance (defects). |
| Root cause analysis (RCA) to uncover causes |
| Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) for identifying possible product, service, and process failures |
| Multi-vari chart to detect different types of variation within a process |
| Improve process performance by addressing and eliminating the root causes. |
| Design of experiments (DOE) to solve problems from complex processes or systems where there are many factors influencing the outcome and where it is impossible to isolate one factor or variable from the others |
| Kaizen event to introduce rapid change by focusing on a narrow project and using the ideas and motivation of the people who do the work |
| Control the improved process and future process performance. |
| Quality control plan to document what is needed to keep an improved process at its current level |
| Statistical process control (SPC) for monitoring process behavior |
| Balanced Scoring  (my edit) to create a workplace suited for visual control |
| Mistake proofing (poka-yoke) to make errors impossible or immediately detectable |

cheers
Carl
It was a pleasure toclarify


---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 10:02 AM
Subject: Re: AIKR Value Chain
To: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
Cc: Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>, Chris Fox <chris@chriscfox.com>, Paul Alagna <pjalagna@gmail.com>, Justin Stoltzfus <stoltz_sj@hotmail.com>, Jorge Sanchez. <jorgesr@zoho.eu>, Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>



Confirming that the AI KR value chain will be the focus of our next meeting on September 15 (invite to be sent separately).In addition to ITIF's model (see below),  as a use-case please review The knowledge-value chain: A conceptual framework for knowledge translation in health (  Bulletin of the World Health Organisation ). In particular, please peruse fig1.    The mission, vision,goals and strategies of a public healthorganization or social enterprise drivethe knowledge-value chain. The higherthe knowledge performance related todyadic capabilities, the higher the valuegenerated (Fig. 1).  
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6869769_The_knowledge-value_chain_A_conceptual_framework_for_knowledge_translation_in_health 
have a great weekend 
Carl Mattocksco-chair AIKRCG
It was a pleasure toclarify


On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 4:30 PM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote:

  
Carl, at the end of our televideo conference earlier today you indicated intent to focus on the value chain at our next meeting on September 15.  So I thought you might like to see this objective in ITIF's model for long-term U.S./Western revitalization (in competition with China):
 
 
...........