W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-aikr@w3.org > May 2020

Re: stratml stratnav vs wiki - parsers vs no parser

From: carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 12:37:18 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHtonukcXMU8syf7PZ5NH7U_x=am26vOpvSx3af581G_JpE7cQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
Towards having a common understanding of how best to use   stratml stratnav
vs wiki . Please consider:

Wiki is used to facilitate AIKRCG as one-of-many   Community Groups enable
anyone to socialize their ideas for the Web at the W3C for possible future
standardization.
note: W3C Working Groups can then build mature Web standards on top of best
of the experimental work

Wiki is best used to publish ideas and activities that promote  AIKRCG
member discussions (email and meetings)  about them.

StratML is a specification  that enables  AIKRCG members to  document plans
for experimental activities.
To provide clarity,  StraMl simplifies how members can  formulate
Strategies by  connecting / contrasting /comparing the content of Multiple
activities in multiple plans.
StratNavApp is an online tool for collaborative business strategy
development and execution of  multiple (AIKRCG member) activities.

One ongoing AIKRCG experimental activity is focused on how an AI Strategist
can leverage  StratML, as in,  (1) track performance of AIKR member plans ,
(2)  track performance of an AIKR machine powered by ML, (3) track
performance of an AIKR machine  that executes a StratML plan rendered in
XML . Insights gained from include:

   - I and 2 and 3 are complex - each of them has to be managed with a
   distinct but connected plan.
   - Each one may have the potential to become a new standard  (StratML is
   an international  standard)
   - Plans are best defined and more easily tracked when populated  with
   actionable statements

Carl





It was a pleasure to clarify



On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 4:03 AM Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
wrote:

> to make the point again, as shared already
>
> -  this CG is not about adopting promoting stratml per se, but as a means
> for this CG to set its goals and trackes its achievements/progress
>
> - I have started entering the goals (as declared in the opening mission
> when the CG came together) in the plan using the stratnav app,  The goals
> are going to be achieved via deliverables which at the moment are trough
> talks and papers - I hve a research obect and a couple of models in the
> works to tackle specific problems (related to explainability bias etc)
> these will be shared as drafts and will be made available for comments and
> contribution through this list
>
> - StratML use in this CG seems mostly related to  Owen rendering and
> listing the formatted resources, for which we are thankful, and through
> Chris stratnav app which facilitates the use of stratml
>
> - I have asked about the parser for stratml since it was first mentioned,
> but I was told there isnt one
> that however Jorge is working on one, have not yet seen it.  have offered
> to help with the parser, but
> have not seen anything yet unnless I missed some email (ping me if that is
> the case please)
>
> - Paul who recently joined - welcome - seems to be using a parser and
> identifying issuesrelating to the parsin
>
> but what parser?
>
> what domain?
>
> see the other open questions in various threads
>
> p
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 26 May 2020 16:38:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 26 May 2020 16:38:08 UTC