- From: carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 08:20:38 -0400
- To: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHtonumdOG4tee-3mnUMNEAAK5A-OxZ=Q7qQ_i1z9-1YZoLPiA@mail.gmail.com>
Milton Thanks for affirming : So in a strict sense of formalized representation for protocols you could say that declarative and imperative (procedural) knowledge would cover protocols. To help us consider how best to approach the use-case - please share the section of the diagram focused on PROTOCOL thanks Carl It was a pleasure to clarify On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 1:08 AM ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program < metadataportals@yahoo.com> wrote: > Carl, > > I took the liberty of checking the types of knowledge in philosophy, and > found a very useful page that covers 14 types of knowledge. > > See: > 14 Types of Knowledge (Updated 2020) | Helpful Professor > <https://helpfulprofessor.com/types-of-knowledge/> > > 14 Types of Knowledge (Updated 2020) | Helpful Professor > > Knowledge is "stored facts". All humans are capable of the storage of > facts or information for retrieval at a la... > <https://helpfulprofessor.com/types-of-knowledge/> > It will take (3) dispersed knowledge, (4) domain or expert knowledge, (5) > empirical knowledge, (6) encoded knowledge, (10) imperative knowledge and > (11) descriptive knowledge to cover all processes in the three generalized > types of processes. > > Types (3) and (5) lead to (4) which leads to (6) and (11). > > So in a strict sense of formalized representation for protocols you could > say that declarative and imperative (procedural) knowledge would cover > protocols. > > but the framework also covers processes that do not involve protocols. > > I am working on a diagram to make this explicit for the entirety of the > disease control framework. > > regards > > Milton Ponson > GSM: +297 747 8280 > PO Box 1154, Oranjestad > Aruba, Dutch Caribbean > Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to > all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied > mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development > > > On Monday, May 25, 2020, 7:49:28 PM ADT, carl mattocks < > carlmattocks@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Milton > > Thanks for sharing the insights gained from your ambitious plan - and the > use-case 'for StratML utilized in AI, the KRID can be defined in unique > Categories'. > To help add more detail - do you consider that (all rules/syntax/workflow/ > etc) defined as 'Protocol' can be made explicit with Declarative and/or > Imperative Knowledge? > > cheers > Carl > > > It was a pleasure to clarify > > > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 4:47 PM ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program < > metadataportals@yahoo.com> wrote: > > As I indicated earlier I have embarked on the rather ambitious plan of > writing an article, titled "A Smart City Framework for Disease Control > Utilizing Sensor, Tracing, Tracking, Wearable and Medical Technologies". > > There are a couple of important factors to take into account. First and > foremost real-time spatio-temporal modeling in a smart city setting, this > closely mirrors cellular structures found in wireless networking. Second, > there is the modeling of processes. This is done by defining all related > systems for disease control as a "set of systems of complex adaptive > systems". Now some of these are very similar yet in terms of data and > information required slightly variable. Then there is the inevitable > problem of reliability of data, and verification thereof. And finally how > to structure the data to allow manipulation thereof, and how to model all > of this mathematically. > > What is striking in all of this, is regardless of the complexity of this > set of systems of complex adaptive systems, three things stand out. (1) the > use of protocols which can be made explicit by flowchart diagram > algorithms, (2) protocols can be made explicit in a strategic planning > context and thus converted to (eGovernment) machine readable format, (3) > the exchange of data and information between the myriad of components in > the disease control system is driven by categories of protocols defined by > generalized chain-linked processes with specific required outcomes. > > As I also indicated in a prior post, the groundbreaking book published by > Oxford University Press, Introduction to the Theory of Complex Systems by > Stefan Thurner, Rudolf Hanel and Peter Klimek, "the kaleidoscope of complex > systems are best described by the rules that govern their interactions". > > The framework thus boils down to three generalized processes: (1) > Prevention, (2) Mitigation, (3) Creation of Viral Loss-of-funtion. > > Using category theory to generalize interaction rules, cellular > spatio-temporal modeling, equivalence of protocols, flowchart diagrams and > programs, and chain-linking protocols using strategic planning for desired > inputs and outcomes makes it possible to make sense of required data and > desired information outcomes necessary at each stage of a process chain > link. > > This makes a case for StratML utilized in AI, the KRID can be defined in > unique Categories. > > So what I am getting at is that we are able to uniquely define knowledge > representation NOT by the objects in play by the rules that govern their > interactions which specify desired outcomes, be it in simple systems or in > complex adaptive systems context > > And for this category theory is indispensable. > > Thus our efforts in AIKR StratML strategies are very worthwhile pursuing. > > regards > > Milton Ponson > GSM: +297 747 8280 > PO Box 1154, Oranjestad > Aruba, Dutch Caribbean > Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to > all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied > mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development > >
Received on Tuesday, 26 May 2020 12:21:28 UTC