call follow up notes

Thanks to those who participated in the call yesterday, nice to hear people
voices
and please share follow up emails on the list perhaps?
Look forward to the summary of actions, Carl please remind us what we are
supposed to do
Two quick points from me
1. Chris and Owen said that when they tried it the search function
generated with google code over stratml documents didnt work. the first
thing that comes to mind is a granularity problem.  If the GOALS in Stratml
are chunked  as paragraphs, even long wordy paragraphs, and the search
function/parser is set to identify individual phonemes/words, then running
the query would not yield results, or at least not good ones
Could it be a question of modelling the documents in a more granular way,
or simply attaching more specific metadata/keywords to each set - say,
GOALS so that the engines can easily identify matching content? Assume we
can add keywords to each section of the strategy plan then these keywords
would also have to be added to the search engine (tell the engine what to
look for using certain parameters as opposed to guessing). This could
increase the precision of the recall
Let me know if this make sense?  Glad to see that jorge is keen to work on
the query, look forward
to be seeing what he his planning

2.  is there a workflow/dependency between
GOAL(s), ACTION(s), OUTCOME RESULT   RECOMMENDATION.more action in StratML?

I have seen in a related post call email that it is possible to set up
reminders which I think would do the job, but it would be also good imho to
model GOAL ACTION OUTCOME RESULT new action as a set
Or something similar

Will reply to off list emails soon, thanks a lot for helping to advance this
I encourage off ist emails to be shared on list mostly for archiving
purposes

Thanks

PDM