- From: ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <metadataportals@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 16:26:29 +0000 (UTC)
- To: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>, <paoladimaio10@googlemail.com>
- Message-ID: <1315250962.657706.1583511989586@mail.yahoo.com>
I agree with you on most points. The caveat is the challenges with deontic logic. Too swamped with work to be able to pitch in/collaborate. Hopefully someone else can help co-author a paper. Milton Ponson GSM: +297 747 8280 PO Box 1154, Oranjestad Aruba, Dutch Caribbean Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development On Friday, March 6, 2020, 5:06:10 AM AST, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote: It looks to me that AI/KR and StratML are a natural implementation vehicle for deontic logic, in many ways Some literature exists exploring the association of DeonL and computer science, the topic iscomplex I can understand why the cognitive load required may exceed the capacity of this group at the moment but never know I am now exploring further the convergence between AI/KL ande Deonl, Let me start by introducing some references https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-deontic/challenges.html https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-deontic/ Based on the intro above, it looks to me that stratML as understand it so far, has a potential to implement deontic logic neatly. at least in part, and if we decide to follow up this avenue, stratML may have to evolve accordingly (to support deontL constructs not yet supported for example) but that would enhance it greatly, in the long term I am attempting to draft an abstract with a view to have a paper completed in one weekhttps://docs.google.com/document/d/1UovxH61OEHr33QdVR53Kcs0mJPQc3V4cE95i-QyqrQ8/edit anyone interested to coauthor let me know, if not just wish me good luck cheers PDM
Received on Friday, 6 March 2020 16:26:44 UTC