- From: Chris Fox <chris@chriscfox.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 16:50:29 +0100
- To: Paul Alagna <pjalagna@gmail.com>
- Cc: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>, Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>, Carl Mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>, Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
- Message-ID: <CAKNnk3m_2ZhN4rO2hNkW5ui9zQ0Kr37c_VRsd7rOfe-ggz=u5w@mail.gmail.com>
I agree with both Paul and Owen's points. On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 at 16:16, Paul Alagna <pjalagna@gmail.com> wrote: > All; > I come from a very object oriented world. > I order a pizza from amazon I don't know nor do I care about their > methods. I do care that they subscribe to some standard of quality and > sanitary oversight. but their inner methods are unknown to me. > > So too for AI. the AI strategist is consulted because the business world > has needs for a solution that might be best solved by AI. (EG some business > entity said "we need facial recognition of tabby cats" could AI do that?) > > Once that consultation leads to a contract. the AI PRODUCT is designed > using the pillers of "requirements"(think), "prototyping"(act), > "testing"(check), and "acceptance"(do) in whatever method that AI > production team is comfortable with. > I would add another 3 pillers from ISO 9000: "Document"(explain it), > "Audit"(record your changes), "Review"(continuous improvement) > > The KPI's for an AI product should be unique to AI with some large overlap > with those of software systems. > > the "Knowledge" {imho} comes from the interaction with those element from > the Zachman paradigm. see > > https://www.visual-paradigm.com/guide/enterprise-architecture/what-is-zachman-framework/ > > as does the usefulness, ethics and lawfulness. > > thoughts? > > Paul Alagna > > — this is the fun part > > On Jun 10, 2020, at 9:24 AM, Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote: > > Chris, like you, I'm unclear on the difference between an AI Strategist > and and AI KR Strategist. I don't know what the latter is. > > However, if there is a valid distinction between the two, it should be > clarified in the roles specified for each of them -- in model performance > plans. Hopefully, we can come to clearer agreement on that during our next > meeting, if not via edits to the draft performance plan in the meantime. > > Owen > On 6/10/2020 6:52 AM, Chris Fox wrote: > > > > On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 at 10:59, Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 4:12 PM Chris Fox <chris@chriscfox.com> wrote: >> >>> I agree that we should stick to Goals and Objectives. >>> >> >> so would the goals for th ai strategy be......... what isare the goal/s >> of the strategy? >> > > Not "the goals of *the strategy*" but rather "the goals of *an AI > strategist*". > > On a related note, we've previously talked around in circles about "AI > strategist" or "AI KR strategist". I understand the former and think that's > is what we are talking about. I am not sure I understand the latter. > > >> >>> If you get into system development life cycles you will open up the >>> debate between various types of waterfall and agile methodologies. That is >>> a whole different can of worms and not necessary for our purposes. >>> >>> so should we set aside the whole requirements and focus on what are the >> goals of the >> ai strategy/ist which are not already covered by ai systems development >> and maybe define how the ai strategy interfaces with the >> requirements/specification which is what the sys dev plan would be >> for >> > > I think we should focus on the specific goals of an AI Strategist. > Ideally, they should not overlap with those of an AI systems developer. If > they do, then I suspect we have failed to achieve separation of > responsibilities. That does not mean that one person cannot fulfil both > roles. But the roles should still remain separate. > > -- > Chris Fox > Chris C Fox Consulting Limited > chris@chriscfox.com > +44 77 860 21712 > <http://www.chriscfox.com/> [image: https://calendar.x.ai/chriscfox] > <https://calendar.x.ai/chriscfox> > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/chriscfox> > <http://www.twitter.com/chriscfox> > <http://www.facebook.com/pages/StrategicCoffee/102920468071> > <https://join.skype.com/invite/oxuJFtEDlgQw> > Have you tried https://www.StratNavApp.com <https://www.stratnavapp.com/>, > the online collaborative tool for strategy development and execution? > > Chris C Fox Consulting Limited is registered in England and Wales as a > Private Limited Company: Company Number 6939359. Registered Office: Unit 4 > Vista Place, Coy Pond Business Park, Ingworth Road, Poole BH12 1JY > > > Thanks > PAUL ALAGNA > PJAlagna@Gmail.com <PJAlagna@gmail.com> > 732-322-5641 > > > > -- Chris Fox Chris C Fox Consulting Limited chris@chriscfox.com +44 77 860 21712 <http://www.chriscfox.com> [image: https://calendar.x.ai/chriscfox] <https://calendar.x.ai/chriscfox> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/chriscfox> <http://www.twitter.com/chriscfox> <http://www.facebook.com/pages/StrategicCoffee/102920468071> <https://join.skype.com/invite/oxuJFtEDlgQw> Have you tried https://www.StratNavApp.com <https://www.stratnavapp.com/>, the online collaborative tool for strategy development and execution? Chris C Fox Consulting Limited is registered in England and Wales as a Private Limited Company: Company Number 6939359. Registered Office: Unit 4 Vista Place, Coy Pond Business Park, Ingworth Road, Poole BH12 1JY
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2020 15:50:57 UTC