- From: ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <metadataportals@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 14:19:44 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
- Cc: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <803059848.1722516.1594131584375@mail.yahoo.com>
Dear Paola The sensory input must factor in four categories, physical sciences, social sciences, life and bio sciences and philosophy. Each of these four fields have different paradigms for application of the the scientific method, in practice resulting in either statistical, quantum or deterministic bias. And there are the issues of Sensory data and Sensory perception, which for quantum physicists and Buddhist philosophers alike are well known issues, that come into play. Choosing to observe and record data about (a system of) objects creates statistical and deterministic and/or quantum bias, and it can be either at the observed, perceived or recorded data level. There is another way of visualizing bias by using an optical diagram with a focal point (lens), the observed object left of the focal point and perceived/recorded object right of the of the focal point. Using intersecting lines that go through the focal point, you get two cones. The right cone incorporates the bias. The deterministic, statistical and quantum bias created at sense data level create an out of focus imaging from observation to recording in the optical diagram. I hope you can figure out how to put this an a diagram. I am swamped in work, and do not have the time to digitally create what is needed in a diagram. cheers Milton Ponson GSM: +297 747 8280 PO Box 1154, Oranjestad Aruba, Dutch Caribbean Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development On Monday, July 6, 2020, 8:29:01 PM ADT, Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com> wrote: Milton, Thanks I am interested to hear alternative views - if they make sense, I ll incorporate them The diagram represents factors contributing to systemic bias there is no spiral in the diagram as such, however, your perceptual bias, which is the first level of entanglement of systemic bias, may lead you to see this as a spiralSomewhat your comment proves the point that the first level of bias may be perceptual (sensory) if you notice, there are no inputsin any of the factors- Perceptual bias is however based on sensory input, like cognitive bias is based on knowledge inputIf this diagram evolves into a causal map, that may be a good idea to have second level diagramwitht the input factors- Please provide an alternative diagram showing your view of systemic bias, if you have any? On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:33 PM ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <metadataportals@yahoo.com> wrote: The diagram is based on deterministic worldview. Our world is quantum physical and deterministic. And unfortunately I must disagree with the outward spiraling sequence. I see no sensory input item there. Milton Ponson GSM: +297 747 8280 PO Box 1154, Oranjestad Aruba, Dutch Caribbean Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development On Saturday, July 4, 2020, 11:04:51 PM ADT, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote: In relation to an earlier exchange, where I suggested that KR can be used to reduce systemic bias, I am sharing with our CGs a characterization of systemic bias - since it is poorly definedin the literature. There is an element of cognitive bias which I hope can be of interest to CogAIThe model is part of a research project on (KR) Neurosymbolic IntegrationI am offering it also for evaluation/discussion and eventually will be included as a deliverable (when eventually we get to publish a CG report)I am working of part 2 of the model which drills into other aspectsof systemic bias, will follow
Attachments
- image/png attachment: image.png
Received on Tuesday, 7 July 2020 14:20:08 UTC