Re: AI, StratML, SDGs, Dashboards & Collaboration

Owen
thanks-
regarding Milton's question and setting up some demos for stratML
 at the back of my mind there has been the thought of trying out executable
english. then yesterday found a post by Adrian to this list and wonder if
he d like to demo executable english on topf o stratML
http://www.reengineeringllc.com/

Regarding your post, thanks for the points you make

Regarding the FOL Institute, they are definitely doing interest work along
the line of my own research interest (existential risk, anthropocene etc).
I think I might have written to them once but did not receive any sign of
intelligent life come back. could have been busy time
 I look forward to the day when our paths may converge, in the meantime if
you are inclined to invite them to collaborate with us feel free to go
ahead on our behalf!

PDM



On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 1:08 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote:

> According to Wikipedia, intelligence involves perceiving the environment
> and acting to maximize the chance of achieving goals.
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence  The article also
> cites Tesler's Theorem: "AI is whatever hasn't been done yet."  See also
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_effect
>
> While it may be possible for intelligent agents to decipher goals from
> unstructured text, it seems likely they might be able to more effectively
> help us achieve our goals if we make them explicit in terms of near-term
> objectives and performance indicators.  Since that has not yet been done on
> a worldwide scale, why should it not begin with us?
>
> There are more than 4,000 plans in the StratML collection that can be used
> for demonstration purposes, including the SDGs:
> https://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#UNSDG
>
> As far as I am aware, however, progress against the SDGs is not being
> reported in an open, standard, machine-readable format.  See, for example,
> the HTML, CSV & PDF at  https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2019/  The
> presentation of the data is actually pretty good.  See, for example,
> https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2019/goal-17/
>
> The problem is that few people know about and take the time to view it,
> much less to do anything about it.  While making the data available in
> open, standard, machine-readable format would not solve that problem, it
> would make it easier for value-added intermediaries to engage stakeholders
> in ways that are more accessible and meaningful to them, e.g., in their own
> personal and organizational/corporate performance plans.  From my
> perspective, failing to do so is an example of artificial ignorance.
> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/artificial-ignorance-owen-ambur/
>
> Here's an article addressing the role of AI in achieving the SDGs:
> https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-14108-y  It is relatively long
> and unstructured and I haven't taken the time to read all of it.  However,
> here some key point:
>
> We therefore recommend that AI applications that target SDGs are open and
> explicit about guiding ethical principles, also by indicating explicitly
> how they align with the existing guidelines.
>
> See StratML tool, app, and service requirements Objective 8.3: Values
> Alignment
> <https://stratml.us/carmel/iso/SMLTASwStyle.xml#_154473aa-208f-11e6-a80e-7333871eb3cb>
> & Goal 9: Values Validation
> <https://stratml.us/carmel/iso/SMLTASwStyle.xml#_15447c10-208f-11e6-a80e-7333871eb3cb>.
> Those requirements are prime candidates for the application of AI.
>
> On the other hand, the lack of interpretability of AI, which is currently
> one of the challenges of AI research, adds an additional complication to
> the enforcement of such regulatory actions ...
>
> AI developers and agents should be expected, if not required, to document
> their objectives and performance indicators in an open, standard format
> that is both human- and machine-readable.
>
> ... associations such as the Future of Life Institute are reviewing and
> collecting policy actions and shared principles around the world to monitor
> progress towards sustainable-development-friendly AI ...
>
> Perhaps we should schedule a televideo conference for them to brief us on
> their AI activities and explore prospects for collaboration.
> https://stratml.us/carmel/iso/FLIwStyle.xml
>
> A global and science-driven debate to develop shared principles and
> legislation among nations and cultures is necessary to shape a future in
> which AI positively contributes to the achievement of all the SDGs.
>
> Whenever I see calls for legislation and regulation, I view it both as a
> cop out as well as an attempt to dictate to others that which we should
> take upon ourselves to do, in partnership with those who share our values
> and objectives.  Perhaps those who view it as the best way forward should
> either study the China model ... or just stand idly by and wait for them to
> impose it on all of us.  For an alternative model, see
> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/privately-well-practiced-public-policymaking-owen-ambur/
>
> Here's a shorter article on AI & the SDGs:
> https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/blog/2019/Using_AI_to_help_achieve_Sustainable_Development_Goals.html
> It suggests, "To improve data accessibility, for example, collectors and
> generators of data, whether governments or companies, will need to grant
> greater access to NGOs and others seeking to use the data for public
> service."  However, it shows no awareness of the importance of open,
> machine-readable data standards -- perhaps because usage of such standards
> would reduce the need for consultants ... or, rather, it would require them
> to add higher-level values than massaging amorphous, aimless data.
>
> With respect to dashboards, see
> https://gcn.com/articles/2017/09/12/yet-another-dashboard.aspx &
> https://gcn.com/articles/2017/05/10/machine-readable-data.aspx
>
> I look forward to learning what we might be able to do together along
> these lines.
>
> Owen
>
>
> On 2/8/2020 7:55 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>
>
> xml constitutes a structure for language, and certain kinds of AI can be
> built
> using structured language expressions
>
> PDM
>
> On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 1:34 AM ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <
> metadataportals@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Can AI be used on StratML utilizing ontologies to create customizable
>> dashboards for project management and collaboration for large networks of
>> collaborating people from different fields of work?
>>
>> Question is of importance in eGovernment, eGovernance and achieving
>> sustainable development goals.
>>
>> Milton Ponson
>> GSM: +297 747 8280
>> PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
>> Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
>> Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to
>> all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied
>> mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development
>>
>