public schema for AI ethics

so yes,nd the scope of work in AIKR  is very broad

So, I am now focusing on AI Ethics *in response to the big mess and
superficiality in existing standards
as I am working in some related groups

For the rest of the year I plan to do the following
- identify AI Ethics standards and reference documents (normative or not
normative)
- map the concepts and vocabularies from these standards and create an
abstract set of sort
that will become
-  public schema for AIKR
- will seek advise from the experts on this list on what method for the
extraction evaluation and representation of this resources will be
- I shall document this work in a task list and welcome the help of group
members with any of the tasks I set out to pursue, or with any
complementary effort that that me the public schema more useful
*QUESTION* for Dave R
does W3C have experience in coordinating with other standardization bodies
such as ISO, IEEE and BSI?
The standards themselves may not be publicly accessible, but surely there
are papers and books that describe such standards that can be considered
'knowledge sources', so I can use these as the references-
However, maybe W3C has a formal process for engaging in collaboration with
other standardization bodies that we should adopt/follow?

I shall try to achieve as much as I can within 2019 and if I do not
accidentally self destroy before, I may seek
formal WG status for this work

Look forward to comments and suggestions


PDM


On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 12:10 PM Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> Dear AIKR @W3C
>
> After some pondering, I think I have identify a sense of scope  and
> direction for
> the work we could do here, which should be feasible
>
> This  group was started to attempt to address great confusion
> and lack of orientation in the AI community, in particular in relation to
> AI ethics (ethics rests on transparency, accountability, understandability
> etc)
>
> It is becoming clearer to me that KR - a minimal set of explicitly
> represented concepts and terms - could help
> to address at least one problem, the lack of interoperability and lack of
> accessibility
> of the standards being devised around AI ethics from the various
> standardization bodies
>
> I am therefore sharing a few slides which I created for an IEEE  workgroup
> to explain what I see the work could be, the focus is the actual KR of the
> standard itself, but the arguments apply
> to all the standards and efforts in progress
>
> Part1
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aQxAYjUNYrsf_5qeHqP0O3FGOpermWAx/view
> part 2
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=1i0mYTX2ylyGKu8glmaA-QxInmVVWeeFN
> (hope these links work)
>
> sorry if I mumble a bit, may have to re-narrate when I have time
>
> Comments, thoughts?
>
> Can we as a W3C WG aim to capture some common denominator among different
> standards
> and aim to produce a set of metadata to represent AI ethical concerns in
> some kind of
> schematic, implementation independent way?
>
> I will then start drafting a paper as promised
>
> PDM
>