Fwd: thoughts on SOS, participatory agenda setting etc

Dear AIKR @W3C

After some pondering, I think I have identify a sense of scope  and
direction for
the work we could do here, which should be feasible

This  group was started to attempt to address great confusion
and lack of orientation in the AI community, in particular in relation to
AI ethics (ethics rests on transparency, accountability, understandability
etc)

It is becoming clearer to me that KR - a minimal set of explicitly
represented concepts and terms - could help
to address at least one problem, the lack of interoperability and lack of
accessibility
of the standards being devised around AI ethics from the various
standardization bodies

I am therefore sharing a few slides which I created for an IEEE  workgroup
to explain what I see the work could be, the focus is the actual KR of the
standard itself, but the arguments apply
to all the standards and efforts in progress

Part1
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aQxAYjUNYrsf_5qeHqP0O3FGOpermWAx/view
part 2
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1i0mYTX2ylyGKu8glmaA-QxInmVVWeeFN
(hope these links work)

sorry if I mumble a bit, may have to re-narrate when I have time

Comments, thoughts?

Can we as a W3C WG aim to capture some common denominator among different
standards
and aim to produce a set of metadata to represent AI ethical concerns in
some kind of
schematic, implementation independent way?

I will then start drafting a paper as promised

PDM