Re: AI can do Better with KR: AI KR Talk in Taipei, contribution

Ah... community of interest....
thanks
P

On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 1:38 AM carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Owen, Paola et al:
>
> Yes, for planning purposes, it is the draft of a proposed AIKR eGovernance
> objective.. that leverages emerging data science best practice  and
> AIKR-centric proofs established by digital clinical trials
>
> AIKR eGovernance objective
>
> Wellness Indicator, a simple fit for purpose score, is used to understand
> effectiveness of a AIKR powered Business Service capability . Purpose has
> been explained by  members of particular Community of Interest (composed of
> a Richly Diverse group of discipline specific Data Scientists  e.g.
> Sociologist, psychologist, dermatologist, …). Explanation is supported by
> Data Science evidence that the capability has been proven in Digital
> Clinical Trials.
>
> Ref:
> https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/events/2019/digital-clinical-trials-workshop-creating-vision-future
>
> Mandatorily, the COI explanation, of AIKR powered service capability,
> identifies  how the COI Formulation was Proven when the service was
> actuated using one or more Registered Agents. Proof includes DataSet
> statistics that report extent of the actual change in state (unfreezing,
> changing and refreezing) for the population of information facets made
> accessible by a  Container populated by  Blockchain & Registry-Repository
> Objects IDs
>
>
>
> cheers
> Carl Mattocks
>
> It was a pleasure to clarify
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 10:37 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Carl, I can almost discern the makings of a plan in the content of your
>> slides but it would be easier to comprehend if it were in the form of an
>> actual plan.
>>
>> The stratml:Relationship elements could be used to align it with the
>> goals set forth in the AIKRCG's plan --
>> http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/AIKRCGwStyle.xml -- using the XForm at
>> http://stratml.us/forms/Part2Form.xml
>>
>> If there is any interest in doing so, I'll be happy to provide any
>> assistance that may be required.
>>
>> Owen
>> On 8/24/2019 5:38 AM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>>
>> Thank you Carl and all
>>
>> i appreciate your input, although it still sounds a bit encrypted.
>> care to unpack it a bit more:?  re the slides something telegraphic *but
>> hopefully clearn nonetheless, will work, for the paper, I may need to
>> articulate some sentence in narrative form
>>
>> is this a suggestion> a proposal> something that you are dong or that you
>> want to do?
>> a couple more questions below
>>
>>>
>>> Embedded this in updated AI can do Better with KR ..
>>>
>>
>>
>>> Wellness (fit for purpose score) Indicator
>>>
>> OF WHAT?
>>
>>
>>> derived from Explain effective change in state (unfreezing, changing
>>> and refreezing)
>>>
>> WHAT CHANGE?
>>
>>
>>> actuated by Registered Agent (using COI Formulated & Proven AIKR )
>>>
>> UHM  COI, COI. COI  - certificae of insurance? issued by who? for what
>> purpose
>>
>>
>>> employing Container Content (Blockchain & Registry-Repository Objects
>>> IDs)
>>>
>> UHM, HOW DOES THAT WORK?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> enjoy
>>>
>>> Carl Mattocks
>>>
>>> Wellness Intelligence . Institute
>>> It was a pleasure to clarify
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 8:56 PM Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thank you Carl Owen and Milton'
>>>> I ll use one slide from each of you - which I may edit a bit -
>>>> including a link/url to any fuller resources
>>>> you want to be included.
>>>> Carl could you please explain with one sentence the points you make,
>>>> especially the less obvious one?
>>>> I need to understand what your are saying in order to be able to relay
>>>> it in the talk
>>>> P
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 12:44 AM carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> My contribution .. using my own suggestion for Title :}
>>>>>
>>>>> enjoy
>>>>> Carl Mattocks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It was a pleasure to clarify
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 2:56 PM carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Excellent Title for one or more slides
>>>>>> AI can do better ... if only we have the understanding
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Carl Mattocks
>>>>>> It was a pleasure to clarify
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 1:35 PM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Paola, I added a slide entitled "'Machine-Readable Knowledge for
>>>>>>> Results" and made a few other tweaks in the attached update.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Having spent my entire 34-year career in government, I too dislike
>>>>>>> politics.  I'm aiming to disintermediate politics and politicians from as
>>>>>>> much as possible -- in a peer-to-peer based worldwide web of intentions,
>>>>>>> stakeholders, and results (which is the vision of the StratML standard).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is not politicians who are to blame so much as We the People
>>>>>>> ourselves.  We can do better ... if only we have the understanding and will
>>>>>>> to do so.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is that not the purpose of "representing" knowledge?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Owen
>>>>>>> On 8/21/2019 11:01 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you Owen
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You send so much stuff and seems all good
>>>>>>> I completely dislike politics, makes me dizzy even
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can easily add two links to the slides and video to my slides and
>>>>>>> paper as pointers to this work
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please take a few more days to elaborate with your associates0 we
>>>>>>> have one week or so -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  please give url for both the resources you attached and  if you
>>>>>>> could  edit to explain (assuming the audience may not know) with a simple
>>>>>>> sentence for each point
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - what is machine readability
>>>>>>> - how is stratml good to deliver machine readabiity and other
>>>>>>> benefits vs other options
>>>>>>> (with link to stratml.org)
>>>>>>> - how is machine redabiity relates to KR and explainability
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This will make the contribution more relevant to the talk
>>>>>>> thank you
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> P
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:47 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Paola, there's nifty introduction to StratML presentation at
>>>>>>>> https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/32364433/introduction-to-stratml-aiim/2
>>>>>>>> However, it is a bit outdated, is not particularly tailored for a KR
>>>>>>>> audience, and probably includes TMI as well.  So I whipped up the attached
>>>>>>>> four slides.  Please let me know if you'd like anything more or different.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This site reads a previous version of Wikipedia's article on
>>>>>>>> StratML for the benefit of the blind, including information subsequently
>>>>>>>> deleted by the Wikipedia police:
>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wV_6rsBOG4o&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm not much for making (or watching) videos myself but I know that
>>>>>>>> many others are.  So I'm copying a couple of my associates in the event
>>>>>>>> they may wish to take up that cause.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's not just politicians who don't want to be held accountable.
>>>>>>>> That's human nature.  So beyond the obligation of each of us to hold
>>>>>>>> ourselves and our immediate associates accountable, we also have the power
>>>>>>>> to hold public officials accountable -- regardless of whether they are
>>>>>>>> willing "man up" to doing so themselves or not.  However, accountability
>>>>>>>> means more than merely holding opinions and criticizing, based upon our own
>>>>>>>> biases and dueling narratives.  It requires clearly specified performance
>>>>>>>> metrics, readily available to stakeholders.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In short it requires an open, standard, machine-readable format
>>>>>>>> like StratML.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> President Trump's management agenda is available in StratML format
>>>>>>>> at http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#Trump, along with a link
>>>>>>>> that opens it in an XForm for anyone who may wish to reports his
>>>>>>>> administration's performance against those objectives.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Former President Obama's change.gov agenda is available at
>>>>>>>> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#Obama
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A bunch of candidate issue statements are available in StratML
>>>>>>>> format at http://ambur.net/#Candidates
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The question is whether voters truly want change or whether, like
>>>>>>>> politicians themselves, they are satisfied with more of the same,
>>>>>>>> self-serving #GOFPAU
>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/all/?authorCompany=%5B%5D&authorIndustry=%5B%5D&contactInterest=%5B%5D&facetCity=%5B%5D&facetCompany=%5B%5D&facetConnectionOf=%5B%5D&facetCurrentCompany=%5B%5D&facetCurrentFunction=%5B%5D&facetGeoRegion=%5B%5D&facetGroup=%5B%5D&facetGuides=%5B%5D&facetIndustry=%5B%5D&facetNetwork=%5B%5D&facetNonprofitInterest=%5B%5D&facetPastCompany=%5B%5D&facetProfessionalEvent=%5B%5D&facetProfileLanguage=%5B%5D&facetRegion=%5B%5D&facetSchool=%5B%5D&facetSeniority=%5B%5D&facetServiceCategory=%5B%5D&facetState=%5B%5D&groups=%5B%5D&keywords=%23gofpau&origin=GLOBAL_SEARCH_HEADER&page=1&refresh=false&skillExplicit=%5B%5D&topic=%5B%5D>
>>>>>>>> and only care about gaining the upper hand to impose their will upon
>>>>>>>> others... in which case we will be demonstrating a sadly lacking sense of
>>>>>>>> enlightenment ... an inability to learn from the mistakes of the past, thus
>>>>>>>> dooming future generations to re-living it.
>>>>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/enlightenment-what-we-fighting-owen-ambur/
>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fighting-political-polarization-owen-ambur/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If that's the case, shame on us.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Owen
>>>>>>>> On 8/21/2019 12:35 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you Owen
>>>>>>>> Most politicians do not really want to be held accountable for what
>>>>>>>> they say or do, especially when
>>>>>>>> their missions fail for unknown reasons (manouvers in political
>>>>>>>> underworld to ensure discord) really
>>>>>>>> that is the problem that xml wont fix.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> People who understand machine readability, do not need to be
>>>>>>>> convinced
>>>>>>>> of anything, those who dont understanding may need a quick lecture,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I ll make sure your contribution is included with your compliments
>>>>>>>> :-) if you want to create
>>>>>>>> a short video or set of slides introducing stratML in a few bullet
>>>>>>>> points also its relation to KR
>>>>>>>> I can also include it as a link as a footnote in the slides and
>>>>>>>> paper
>>>>>>>> Delivers value and does not cost anything
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>> PDM
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 12:17 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Paola, I'm not sure how it might fit into your outline, but from
>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>> perspective, any discussion of "explainability in e-governance"
>>>>>>>>> would be
>>>>>>>>> incomplete without addressing the importance of machine-readable
>>>>>>>>> public
>>>>>>>>> records based upon internationally standardized schemas.
>>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine-readable_document |
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-gov-data-act-machine-readable-records-owen-ambur/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> E-gov plans and performance reports are particularly important
>>>>>>>>> sets of
>>>>>>>>> such documents.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-machine-readable-government-owen-ambur/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> BTW, it would also be good if the agendas for events like this
>>>>>>>>> were
>>>>>>>>> published as performance plans in an open, standard,
>>>>>>>>> machine-readable
>>>>>>>>> format like StratML Part 2 (formerly ANSI/AIIM 22:2017) so that
>>>>>>>>> value-added intermediaries could facilitate stakeholder
>>>>>>>>> collaboration
>>>>>>>>> before, during, and after each event. See, for example,
>>>>>>>>> http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/part2/BS2019wStyle.xml
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In any event, IACT and TEG's about statements are now in the
>>>>>>>>> StratML
>>>>>>>>> collection at http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#IACT &
>>>>>>>>> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#TEG
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Owen
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 8/21/2019 1:14 AM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>>>>>>>>> > We are giving a talk *and a paper next month on the topic
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > AI KR for Explainability in EGovernance
>>>>>>>>> > https://iac2019.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=81CD552EA1F70BF6
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > The outline of the talk so far is: (2-4 slides for each point)
>>>>>>>>> > overview and intro about AI KR and explainability (assuming
>>>>>>>>> audience
>>>>>>>>> > doesn know)
>>>>>>>>> > relevance to E-Governance
>>>>>>>>> > challenges and solutions
>>>>>>>>> > actions (probably referring people back to this group)
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > If anyone is interested in contributing a few slides and a
>>>>>>>>> paragraph
>>>>>>>>> > or two
>>>>>>>>> > let me know and I ll share the drafts for editing, so that you
>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>> > fill out a few bits
>>>>>>>>> > and of course be credited accordingly
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > deadline for final submission is 1 Sept , so all contributions
>>>>>>>>> must
>>>>>>>>> > reach me before Aug 30
>>>>>>>>> > so that I can edit them into the draft
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > Thanks, best regards
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>