Re: AI can do Better with KR: AI KR Talk in Taipei, contribution

Owen, Paola et al:

Yes, for planning purposes, it is the draft of a proposed AIKR eGovernance
objective.. that leverages emerging data science best practice  and
AIKR-centric proofs established by digital clinical trials

AIKR eGovernance objective

Wellness Indicator, a simple fit for purpose score, is used to understand
effectiveness of a AIKR powered Business Service capability . Purpose has
been explained by  members of particular Community of Interest (composed of
a Richly Diverse group of discipline specific Data Scientists  e.g.
Sociologist, psychologist, dermatologist, …). Explanation is supported by
Data Science evidence that the capability has been proven in Digital
Clinical Trials.

Ref:
https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/events/2019/digital-clinical-trials-workshop-creating-vision-future

Mandatorily, the COI explanation, of AIKR powered service capability,
identifies  how the COI Formulation was Proven when the service was
actuated using one or more Registered Agents. Proof includes DataSet
statistics that report extent of the actual change in state (unfreezing,
changing and refreezing) for the population of information facets made
accessible by a  Container populated by  Blockchain & Registry-Repository
Objects IDs



cheers
Carl Mattocks

It was a pleasure to clarify


On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 10:37 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote:

> Carl, I can almost discern the makings of a plan in the content of your
> slides but it would be easier to comprehend if it were in the form of an
> actual plan.
>
> The stratml:Relationship elements could be used to align it with the goals
> set forth in the AIKRCG's plan --
> http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/AIKRCGwStyle.xml -- using the XForm at
> http://stratml.us/forms/Part2Form.xml
>
> If there is any interest in doing so, I'll be happy to provide any
> assistance that may be required.
>
> Owen
> On 8/24/2019 5:38 AM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>
> Thank you Carl and all
>
> i appreciate your input, although it still sounds a bit encrypted.
> care to unpack it a bit more:?  re the slides something telegraphic *but
> hopefully clearn nonetheless, will work, for the paper, I may need to
> articulate some sentence in narrative form
>
> is this a suggestion> a proposal> something that you are dong or that you
> want to do?
> a couple more questions below
>
>>
>> Embedded this in updated AI can do Better with KR ..
>>
>
>
>> Wellness (fit for purpose score) Indicator
>>
> OF WHAT?
>
>
>> derived from Explain effective change in state (unfreezing, changing and refreezing)
>>
>>
> WHAT CHANGE?
>
>
>> actuated by Registered Agent (using COI Formulated & Proven AIKR )
>>
> UHM  COI, COI. COI  - certificae of insurance? issued by who? for what
> purpose
>
>
>> employing Container Content (Blockchain & Registry-Repository Objects IDs)
>>
> UHM, HOW DOES THAT WORK?
>
>
>
>
>>
>> enjoy
>>
>> Carl Mattocks
>>
>> Wellness Intelligence . Institute
>> It was a pleasure to clarify
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 8:56 PM Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you Carl Owen and Milton'
>>> I ll use one slide from each of you - which I may edit a bit - including
>>> a link/url to any fuller resources
>>> you want to be included.
>>> Carl could you please explain with one sentence the points you make,
>>> especially the less obvious one?
>>> I need to understand what your are saying in order to be able to relay
>>> it in the talk
>>> P
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 12:44 AM carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> My contribution .. using my own suggestion for Title :}
>>>>
>>>> enjoy
>>>> Carl Mattocks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It was a pleasure to clarify
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 2:56 PM carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Excellent Title for one or more slides
>>>>> AI can do better ... if only we have the understanding
>>>>>
>>>>> Carl Mattocks
>>>>> It was a pleasure to clarify
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 1:35 PM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Paola, I added a slide entitled "'Machine-Readable Knowledge for
>>>>>> Results" and made a few other tweaks in the attached update.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Having spent my entire 34-year career in government, I too dislike
>>>>>> politics.  I'm aiming to disintermediate politics and politicians from as
>>>>>> much as possible -- in a peer-to-peer based worldwide web of intentions,
>>>>>> stakeholders, and results (which is the vision of the StratML standard).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is not politicians who are to blame so much as We the People
>>>>>> ourselves.  We can do better ... if only we have the understanding and will
>>>>>> to do so.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is that not the purpose of "representing" knowledge?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Owen
>>>>>> On 8/21/2019 11:01 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you Owen
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You send so much stuff and seems all good
>>>>>> I completely dislike politics, makes me dizzy even
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can easily add two links to the slides and video to my slides and
>>>>>> paper as pointers to this work
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please take a few more days to elaborate with your associates0 we
>>>>>> have one week or so -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  please give url for both the resources you attached and  if you
>>>>>> could  edit to explain (assuming the audience may not know) with a simple
>>>>>> sentence for each point
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - what is machine readability
>>>>>> - how is stratml good to deliver machine readabiity and other
>>>>>> benefits vs other options
>>>>>> (with link to stratml.org)
>>>>>> - how is machine redabiity relates to KR and explainability
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This will make the contribution more relevant to the talk
>>>>>> thank you
>>>>>>
>>>>>> P
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:47 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Paola, there's nifty introduction to StratML presentation at
>>>>>>> https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/32364433/introduction-to-stratml-aiim/2
>>>>>>> However, it is a bit outdated, is not particularly tailored for a KR
>>>>>>> audience, and probably includes TMI as well.  So I whipped up the attached
>>>>>>> four slides.  Please let me know if you'd like anything more or different.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This site reads a previous version of Wikipedia's article on StratML
>>>>>>> for the benefit of the blind, including information subsequently deleted by
>>>>>>> the Wikipedia police:
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wV_6rsBOG4o&feature=youtu.be
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm not much for making (or watching) videos myself but I know that
>>>>>>> many others are.  So I'm copying a couple of my associates in the event
>>>>>>> they may wish to take up that cause.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's not just politicians who don't want to be held accountable.
>>>>>>> That's human nature.  So beyond the obligation of each of us to hold
>>>>>>> ourselves and our immediate associates accountable, we also have the power
>>>>>>> to hold public officials accountable -- regardless of whether they are
>>>>>>> willing "man up" to doing so themselves or not.  However, accountability
>>>>>>> means more than merely holding opinions and criticizing, based upon our own
>>>>>>> biases and dueling narratives.  It requires clearly specified performance
>>>>>>> metrics, readily available to stakeholders.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In short it requires an open, standard, machine-readable format like
>>>>>>> StratML.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> President Trump's management agenda is available in StratML format
>>>>>>> at http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#Trump, along with a link
>>>>>>> that opens it in an XForm for anyone who may wish to reports his
>>>>>>> administration's performance against those objectives.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Former President Obama's change.gov agenda is available at
>>>>>>> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#Obama
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A bunch of candidate issue statements are available in StratML
>>>>>>> format at http://ambur.net/#Candidates
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The question is whether voters truly want change or whether, like
>>>>>>> politicians themselves, they are satisfied with more of the same,
>>>>>>> self-serving #GOFPAU
>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/all/?authorCompany=%5B%5D&authorIndustry=%5B%5D&contactInterest=%5B%5D&facetCity=%5B%5D&facetCompany=%5B%5D&facetConnectionOf=%5B%5D&facetCurrentCompany=%5B%5D&facetCurrentFunction=%5B%5D&facetGeoRegion=%5B%5D&facetGroup=%5B%5D&facetGuides=%5B%5D&facetIndustry=%5B%5D&facetNetwork=%5B%5D&facetNonprofitInterest=%5B%5D&facetPastCompany=%5B%5D&facetProfessionalEvent=%5B%5D&facetProfileLanguage=%5B%5D&facetRegion=%5B%5D&facetSchool=%5B%5D&facetSeniority=%5B%5D&facetServiceCategory=%5B%5D&facetState=%5B%5D&groups=%5B%5D&keywords=%23gofpau&origin=GLOBAL_SEARCH_HEADER&page=1&refresh=false&skillExplicit=%5B%5D&topic=%5B%5D>
>>>>>>> and only care about gaining the upper hand to impose their will upon
>>>>>>> others... in which case we will be demonstrating a sadly lacking sense of
>>>>>>> enlightenment ... an inability to learn from the mistakes of the past, thus
>>>>>>> dooming future generations to re-living it.
>>>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/enlightenment-what-we-fighting-owen-ambur/
>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fighting-political-polarization-owen-ambur/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If that's the case, shame on us.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Owen
>>>>>>> On 8/21/2019 12:35 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you Owen
>>>>>>> Most politicians do not really want to be held accountable for what
>>>>>>> they say or do, especially when
>>>>>>> their missions fail for unknown reasons (manouvers in political
>>>>>>> underworld to ensure discord) really
>>>>>>> that is the problem that xml wont fix.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> People who understand machine readability, do not need to be
>>>>>>> convinced
>>>>>>> of anything, those who dont understanding may need a quick lecture,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I ll make sure your contribution is included with your compliments
>>>>>>> :-) if you want to create
>>>>>>> a short video or set of slides introducing stratML in a few bullet
>>>>>>> points also its relation to KR
>>>>>>> I can also include it as a link as a footnote in the slides and paper
>>>>>>> Delivers value and does not cost anything
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> PDM
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 12:17 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Paola, I'm not sure how it might fit into your outline, but from my
>>>>>>>> perspective, any discussion of "explainability in e-governance"
>>>>>>>> would be
>>>>>>>> incomplete without addressing the importance of machine-readable
>>>>>>>> public
>>>>>>>> records based upon internationally standardized schemas.
>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine-readable_document |
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-gov-data-act-machine-readable-records-owen-ambur/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> E-gov plans and performance reports are particularly important sets
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> such documents.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-machine-readable-government-owen-ambur/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BTW, it would also be good if the agendas for events like this were
>>>>>>>> published as performance plans in an open, standard,
>>>>>>>> machine-readable
>>>>>>>> format like StratML Part 2 (formerly ANSI/AIIM 22:2017) so that
>>>>>>>> value-added intermediaries could facilitate stakeholder
>>>>>>>> collaboration
>>>>>>>> before, during, and after each event. See, for example,
>>>>>>>> http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/part2/BS2019wStyle.xml
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In any event, IACT and TEG's about statements are now in the
>>>>>>>> StratML
>>>>>>>> collection at http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#IACT &
>>>>>>>> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#TEG
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Owen
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 8/21/2019 1:14 AM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>>>>>>>> > We are giving a talk *and a paper next month on the topic
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > AI KR for Explainability in EGovernance
>>>>>>>> > https://iac2019.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=81CD552EA1F70BF6
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > The outline of the talk so far is: (2-4 slides for each point)
>>>>>>>> > overview and intro about AI KR and explainability (assuming
>>>>>>>> audience
>>>>>>>> > doesn know)
>>>>>>>> > relevance to E-Governance
>>>>>>>> > challenges and solutions
>>>>>>>> > actions (probably referring people back to this group)
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > If anyone is interested in contributing a few slides and a
>>>>>>>> paragraph
>>>>>>>> > or two
>>>>>>>> > let me know and I ll share the drafts for editing, so that you
>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>> > fill out a few bits
>>>>>>>> > and of course be credited accordingly
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > deadline for final submission is 1 Sept , so all contributions
>>>>>>>> must
>>>>>>>> > reach me before Aug 30
>>>>>>>> > so that I can edit them into the draft
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Thanks, best regards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>