Re: AI KR Talk in Taipei, contributions?

Excellent Title for one or more slides
AI can do better ... if only we have the understanding

Carl Mattocks
It was a pleasure to clarify


On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 1:35 PM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote:

> Paola, I added a slide entitled "'Machine-Readable Knowledge for Results"
> and made a few other tweaks in the attached update.
>
> Having spent my entire 34-year career in government, I too dislike
> politics.  I'm aiming to disintermediate politics and politicians from as
> much as possible -- in a peer-to-peer based worldwide web of intentions,
> stakeholders, and results (which is the vision of the StratML standard).
>
> It is not politicians who are to blame so much as We the People
> ourselves.  We can do better ... if only we have the understanding and will
> to do so.
>
> Is that not the purpose of "representing" knowledge?
>
> Owen
> On 8/21/2019 11:01 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>
> Thank you Owen
>
> You send so much stuff and seems all good
> I completely dislike politics, makes me dizzy even
>
> I can easily add two links to the slides and video to my slides and paper
> as pointers to this work
>
> Please take a few more days to elaborate with your associates0 we have one
> week or so -
>
>  please give url for both the resources you attached and  if you could
> edit to explain (assuming the audience may not know) with a simple sentence
> for each point
>
> - what is machine readability
> - how is stratml good to deliver machine readabiity and other benefits vs
> other options
> (with link to stratml.org)
> - how is machine redabiity relates to KR and explainability
>
> This will make the contribution more relevant to the talk
> thank you
>
> P
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:47 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Paola, there's nifty introduction to StratML presentation at
>> https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/32364433/introduction-to-stratml-aiim/2
>> However, it is a bit outdated, is not particularly tailored for a KR
>> audience, and probably includes TMI as well.  So I whipped up the attached
>> four slides.  Please let me know if you'd like anything more or different.
>>
>> This site reads a previous version of Wikipedia's article on StratML for
>> the benefit of the blind, including information subsequently deleted by the
>> Wikipedia police:
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wV_6rsBOG4o&feature=youtu.be
>>
>> I'm not much for making (or watching) videos myself but I know that many
>> others are.  So I'm copying a couple of my associates in the event they may
>> wish to take up that cause.
>>
>> It's not just politicians who don't want to be held accountable.  That's
>> human nature.  So beyond the obligation of each of us to hold ourselves and
>> our immediate associates accountable, we also have the power to hold public
>> officials accountable -- regardless of whether they are willing "man up" to
>> doing so themselves or not.  However, accountability means more than merely
>> holding opinions and criticizing, based upon our own biases and dueling
>> narratives.  It requires clearly specified performance metrics, readily
>> available to stakeholders.
>>
>> In short it requires an open, standard, machine-readable format like
>> StratML.
>>
>> President Trump's management agenda is available in StratML format at
>> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#Trump, along with a link that
>> opens it in an XForm for anyone who may wish to reports his
>> administration's performance against those objectives.
>>
>> Former President Obama's change.gov agenda is available at
>> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#Obama
>>
>> A bunch of candidate issue statements are available in StratML format at
>> http://ambur.net/#Candidates
>>
>> The question is whether voters truly want change or whether, like
>> politicians themselves, they are satisfied with more of the same,
>> self-serving #GOFPAU
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/all/?authorCompany=%5B%5D&authorIndustry=%5B%5D&contactInterest=%5B%5D&facetCity=%5B%5D&facetCompany=%5B%5D&facetConnectionOf=%5B%5D&facetCurrentCompany=%5B%5D&facetCurrentFunction=%5B%5D&facetGeoRegion=%5B%5D&facetGroup=%5B%5D&facetGuides=%5B%5D&facetIndustry=%5B%5D&facetNetwork=%5B%5D&facetNonprofitInterest=%5B%5D&facetPastCompany=%5B%5D&facetProfessionalEvent=%5B%5D&facetProfileLanguage=%5B%5D&facetRegion=%5B%5D&facetSchool=%5B%5D&facetSeniority=%5B%5D&facetServiceCategory=%5B%5D&facetState=%5B%5D&groups=%5B%5D&keywords=%23gofpau&origin=GLOBAL_SEARCH_HEADER&page=1&refresh=false&skillExplicit=%5B%5D&topic=%5B%5D>
>> and only care about gaining the upper hand to impose their will upon
>> others... in which case we will be demonstrating a sadly lacking sense of
>> enlightenment ... an inability to learn from the mistakes of the past, thus
>> dooming future generations to re-living it.
>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/enlightenment-what-we-fighting-owen-ambur/
>> |
>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fighting-political-polarization-owen-ambur/
>>
>> If that's the case, shame on us.
>>
>> Owen
>> On 8/21/2019 12:35 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>>
>> Thank you Owen
>> Most politicians do not really want to be held accountable for what they
>> say or do, especially when
>> their missions fail for unknown reasons (manouvers in political
>> underworld to ensure discord) really
>> that is the problem that xml wont fix.
>>
>> People who understand machine readability, do not need to be convinced
>> of anything, those who dont understanding may need a quick lecture,
>>
>> I ll make sure your contribution is included with your compliments :-) if
>> you want to create
>> a short video or set of slides introducing stratML in a few bullet points
>> also its relation to KR
>> I can also include it as a link as a footnote in the slides and paper
>> Delivers value and does not cost anything
>>
>> Thanks
>> PDM
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 12:17 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Paola, I'm not sure how it might fit into your outline, but from my
>>> perspective, any discussion of "explainability in e-governance" would be
>>> incomplete without addressing the importance of machine-readable public
>>> records based upon internationally standardized schemas.
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine-readable_document |
>>>
>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-gov-data-act-machine-readable-records-owen-ambur/
>>>
>>> E-gov plans and performance reports are particularly important sets of
>>> such documents.
>>>
>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-machine-readable-government-owen-ambur/
>>>
>>> BTW, it would also be good if the agendas for events like this were
>>> published as performance plans in an open, standard, machine-readable
>>> format like StratML Part 2 (formerly ANSI/AIIM 22:2017) so that
>>> value-added intermediaries could facilitate stakeholder collaboration
>>> before, during, and after each event. See, for example,
>>> http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/part2/BS2019wStyle.xml
>>>
>>> In any event, IACT and TEG's about statements are now in the StratML
>>> collection at http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#IACT &
>>> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#TEG
>>>
>>> Owen
>>>
>>> On 8/21/2019 1:14 AM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>>> > We are giving a talk *and a paper next month on the topic
>>> >
>>> > AI KR for Explainability in EGovernance
>>> > https://iac2019.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=81CD552EA1F70BF6
>>> >
>>> > The outline of the talk so far is: (2-4 slides for each point)
>>> > overview and intro about AI KR and explainability (assuming audience
>>> > doesn know)
>>> > relevance to E-Governance
>>> > challenges and solutions
>>> > actions (probably referring people back to this group)
>>> >
>>> > If anyone is interested in contributing a few slides and a paragraph
>>> > or two
>>> > let me know and I ll share the drafts for editing, so that you can
>>> > fill out a few bits
>>> > and of course be credited accordingly
>>> >
>>> > deadline for final submission is 1 Sept , so all contributions must
>>> > reach me before Aug 30
>>> > so that I can edit them into the draft
>>> >
>>> > Thanks, best regards
>>>
>>>