Re: IDESG, AIKRCG & Identity

Also should be easy to extract a set of AI related keywords from your
stratml set?
 we can then make a long list and 'rank them' collectively
and include the top ones in our vocab.
wouldnt this make a nice project and one possible paper?
cheers

P

Dr Paola Di Maio
Center For Technology Ethics
ISTCS.org and  Chair: W3C AIKR  <https://www.w3.org/community/aikr/>




*A bit about me <https://about.me/paoladimaio>*



On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 4:31 PM, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Owen
> I browsed stratml web page and there seem to be a lot of initiatives
> relevant to CG mission
>
> I wonder if one (not me tho) could build a parsing agent to match our cg
> GOAL and mission to other entities
> and then invite the folks in charge or relevant bits to submit their open
> knowledge schemas and/or documentation
> to this cg
>
> if building the agent is too expensive, we could do this manually?
> just thinking
> PDM
>
> Dr Paola Di Maio
> Center For Technology Ethics
> ISTCS.org and  Chair: W3C AIKR  <https://www.w3.org/community/aikr/>
>
>
>
>
> *A bit about me <https://about.me/paoladimaio>*
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 8:33 PM, Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
> wrote:
>
>> IDESG’s mission and objectives are available in StratML format at
>> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#IDESG and so too are the goals and
>> objectives of this group as identified thus far, at
>> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#AIKRCG   I look forward to
>> learning how they might mesh and mutually support each other.
>>
>>
>>
>> BTW, as far as personal and organizational identities are concerned, what
>> I care most about are personal values supported by longer-term goals and
>> near-term objectives realized in performance metrics documented in records
>> having the attributes outlined in ISO 15489.
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine-Readable_Documents#Definition
>>
>>
>>
>> Owen
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 18, 2018 9:26 AM
>> *To:* Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@googlemail.com>
>> *Cc:* ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <metadataportals@yahoo.com>;
>> public-aikr@w3.org
>> *Subject:* Re: welcome newcomers subgroups, home page and categories
>>
>>
>>
>> To help progress .. please consider using a page with content similar to
>> 'concept creation' guidelines
>>
>>
>>
>> ·
>>
>> o    1.1 What sort of 'thing' is this proposed concept anyway?
>> <https://wiki.idesg.kantarainitiative.org/wiki/index.php/Concept_Creation_Guidelines#What_sort_of_.27thing.27_is_this_proposed_concept_anyway.3F>
>>
>> o    1.2 How to decide? Is it important?
>> <https://wiki.idesg.kantarainitiative.org/wiki/index.php/Concept_Creation_Guidelines#How_to_decide.3F_Is_it_important.3F>
>>
>> o    1.3 Understanding context
>> <https://wiki.idesg.kantarainitiative.org/wiki/index.php/Concept_Creation_Guidelines#Understanding_context>
>>
>> o    1.4 The "Conversation" is valuable
>> <https://wiki.idesg.kantarainitiative.org/wiki/index.php/Concept_Creation_Guidelines#The_.22Conversation.22_is_valuable>
>>
>> ·         2 Using a Meta-Model (or two)
>> <https://wiki.idesg.kantarainitiative.org/wiki/index.php/Concept_Creation_Guidelines#Using_a_Meta-Model_.28or_two.29>
>>
>> ·         3 Create a new proposed Concept
>> <https://wiki.idesg.kantarainitiative.org/wiki/index.php/Concept_Creation_Guidelines#Create_a_new_proposed_Concept>
>>
>> https://wiki.idesg.kantarainitiative.org/wiki/index.php/
>> Concept_Creation_Guidelines
>>
>>
>>
>> Carl Mattocks
>>
>>
>> It was a pleasure to clarify
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 1:55 AM, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Thank you Milton
>>
>>
>>
>> Do you have a way you'd like to propose the way forward?
>>
>>
>>
>> Shall we just create two pages, where we collect existing definitions and
>> come up with our own
>>
>> definition that possibly encompasses them all, thus delivers the broadest
>> possible meaning?
>>
>>
>>
>> Should the group be the 'owner' of these two definitions?
>>
>>
>>
>> Let me know if you can initiate these two pages
>>
>>
>>
>> P
>>
>>
>> Dr Paola Di Maio
>>
>> Center For Technology Ethics
>>
>>
>>
>> ISTCS.org
>>
>> Chair: W3C AIKR  <https://www.w3.org/community/aikr/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *A bit about me <https://about.me/paoladimaio>*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 3:21 AM, ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <
>> metadataportals@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Paola and other members of the AIKR community group.
>>
>>
>>
>> Two things we need to establish to reach a consensus of the area we are
>> going to deal with.
>>
>>
>>
>> Number one: the broadest possible definition of what constitutes
>> "artificial intelligence" and number two what constitutes "knowledge
>> representation" also in the broadest possible sense.
>>
>>
>>
>> Only then can we assess what grounds we want or need to cover.
>>
>>
>>
>> It is for that reason I proposed to create and overview map of what
>> currently constitutes AI and related disciplines.
>>
>>
>>
>> But I am also writing a definition paper using category theory to
>> establish a generalized framework which introduces all possible categories
>> of interacting entities, and utilizes a system to define boundaries for AI
>> for interaction, as suggested by the likes of Stephen Hawking, Elon Musk,
>> Kurzweil and countless others.
>>
>>
>>
>> regards
>>
>>
>>
>> Milton Ponson
>> GSM: +297 747 8280
>> PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
>> Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
>> *Project Paradigm*: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development
>> to all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied
>> mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, July 15, 2018 2:41 AM, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Welcome newcomers (22 members!)
>>
>> there's a thread in the mailing list to intro yourselves at your
>> convenience
>>
>>
>>
>> Based on other work, and anticipating future developments
>>
>> (Milton mentioned subgroups) I have created a page subgroups, and opened
>> two additional pages as containers for future subgroups where some work may
>> be needed (AI Ethics KR and Professional schemas).
>>
>> Feel free to edit, add, enter etc
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/community/aikr/subgroups/
>>
>>
>>
>> This is a bit ahead of us perhaps but things are moving fast to have the
>> pages may be cognitive support. The professional schema entry may need
>> better wording, I have not thought it property yet.
>>
>>
>>
>> I have two issues with our home page, maybe W3C folks on this list can
>> assist?
>>
>>
>>
>> Here
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/community/aikr/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 1. The main text area of the page contains some duplicate text, I dont
>> seem to be able to edit/access the upper portion of the group description,
>> I have pinged Veronica Thom about this but have not yet had any reply.
>> Maybe this was created by staff and I cannot edit? can someone assist
>>
>>
>>
>> 2. On the right hand sidebar, where it says 'categories'
>>
>> the categories which I created are not listed, can someone help?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you!!
>>
>>
>>
>> PDM
>>
>>
>> Dr Paola Di Maio
>>
>> Center For Technology Ethics
>>
>>
>>
>> ISTCS.org
>>
>> Chair: W3C AIKR  <https://www.w3.org/community/aikr/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *A bit about me <https://about.me/paoladimaio>*
>>
>> [image: Image removed by sender.]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Received on Friday, 20 July 2018 13:15:00 UTC