Re: Symbols Conformance Rewrite Draft #1

Oops. The branch for my rewrite is:

symbols-js2211a

At the moment I'm not recalling how to recast that as a URI. Sorry. I'm
sure we'll figure it out on the call promptly enough!

Sorry for the extra message.

Janina

Janina Sajka writes:
> Dear All:
> 
> I have rewritten the Conformance section, though I think it still needs
> a bit more rewriting.
> 
> I have also rewritten the adapt-registry URIs to point to TR, and not to
> github.
> 
> I have questions concerning the Properties and Vocabulary sections.
> 
> *	Properties seems to encompass  concepts we do not use with
> *	symbols. Is this true? Which need to go?
> 
> Vocabularies seems to be some kind of include statement to pull in
> symbols, i.e. now a recursive gesture. Am I correct that it should go?
> 
> Lastly, should we not have an example adapt-symbol=NNN with the concept
> value and a SVG or two from a couple AAC symbol sets by way of example.
> 
> Looking forward to your thoughts on today's call,
> 
> Janina
> 
> -- 
> 
> Janina Sajka (she/her/hers)
> Accessibility Consultant https://linkedin.com/in/jsajka
> 
> The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
> Co-Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures	http://www.w3.org/wai/apa
> 
> Linux Foundation Fellow
> https://www.linuxfoundation.org/board-of-directors-2/
> 

-- 

Janina Sajka (she/her/hers)
Accessibility Consultant https://linkedin.com/in/jsajka

The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
Co-Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures	http://www.w3.org/wai/apa

Linux Foundation Fellow
https://www.linuxfoundation.org/board-of-directors-2/

Received on Monday, 21 November 2022 14:14:04 UTC