Symbols Conformance Rewrite Draft #1

Dear All:

I have rewritten the Conformance section, though I think it still needs
a bit more rewriting.

I have also rewritten the adapt-registry URIs to point to TR, and not to
github.

I have questions concerning the Properties and Vocabulary sections.

*	Properties seems to encompass  concepts we do not use with
*	symbols. Is this true? Which need to go?

Vocabularies seems to be some kind of include statement to pull in
symbols, i.e. now a recursive gesture. Am I correct that it should go?

Lastly, should we not have an example adapt-symbol=NNN with the concept
value and a SVG or two from a couple AAC symbol sets by way of example.

Looking forward to your thoughts on today's call,

Janina

-- 

Janina Sajka (she/her/hers)
Accessibility Consultant https://linkedin.com/in/jsajka

The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
Co-Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures	http://www.w3.org/wai/apa

Linux Foundation Fellow
https://www.linuxfoundation.org/board-of-directors-2/

Received on Monday, 21 November 2022 14:12:11 UTC