Re: URGENT: Please Review Capabilities

Janina -

Please note my comments below:

1.) Section 1.2 Scope - Remove the period after the word "methods" in the
Note paragraph that says, "post-source methods. without recourse to.."

2.) The 3 remaining Notes that are not about WCAG are now bolded and
colored dark red. This is acceptable to me.

3.) The additional <br> tags in the diagram description are now
gone and the spacing throughout the document looks good.

4.) The colorized bleed over from the unclosed element in the first Aside
still appears and needs to be corrected. I've also noticed that every "WCAG
Reference" section includes some of that bleed over throughout the
document, at least everywhere a list appears. The bullets in the list are
also "Dodger Blue". Is that correct?

Lastly I have identified several typographical errors! Unfortunately the
first instance that caught my eye didn't appear until Section 4.4.2. So now
I'm going to review the entire document again and I will send you a
complete list in the next few hours, if that's okay.

-Mike



Mike Paciello
Chief Accessibility Officer
michael.paciello@audioeye.com
+1.603.484.1938

[image: AudioEye Registered Trademark Logo]
[image: Follow us on LinkedIn for more accessibility tips!]
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/audioeye-inc/>


On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 12:29 PM Janina Sajka <janina@a11y.nyc> wrote:

> Colleagues:
>
> I have implemented the edits identified in our 22 October
> teleconference.
>
> Please review and advise on all points!!
>
> 1.)     A new Sec 1.7.3: How We Evaluate Automatability
>         https://a11yedge.github.io/capabilities/#automate
>
> 2.)     The 3 remaining Notes that are not about WCAG are now bolded and
> colored dark red.
>
>         If you think we should use different colors, give me CSS
> recognized names!
>         https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/named-color
>
> 3.)     The additional <br> tags in the diagram description are now
> gone. Should white space more like intended!
>
> 4.)     Colorized bleed over from the unclosed element in the first
> Aside should now be gone. Is it now all OK?
>
> Best,
> Janina
>
>
> --
>
> Janina Sajka (she/her/hers)
> Accessibility Consultant https://linkedin.com/in/jsajka
>
> The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
> Co-Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures     http://www.w3.org/wai/apa
>
> Linux Foundation Fellow
> https://www.linuxfoundation.org/board-of-directors-2/
>
>

-- 
The information in this communication is intended for the use of the 
individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information 
that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL and/or exempt from disclosure under law. 
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly 
prohibited.